I DO think they should allow pro users to change the excitation method of the strings to emulate an ebow being applied to the strings like ADSR envelope.

I mostly agree.  But, not at all like an envelope.  Like a mappable parameter.  (It makes sense on the mod wheel for most users, though I'd personally want it per string, via poly aftertouch.)

But, why stop there?  Physical bows are also a thing.  (The whole realm of prepared pianos lies before us, but instantly reconfigurable.)

Plus, even on the eBow front, there's more exotic flavors...
https://youtu.be/fc3DMIPMVj0

I DO think they should allow pro users to change the excitation method of the strings to emulate an ebow being applied to the strings like ADSR envelope.

just search for "ebow piano" it sounds awesome.

I've had to individually sample pianoteq notes and play them backwards to emulate this for soundtracks that need something full and simple like a piano, but without the percussiveness (strings are too buzzy sometimes and synth pads are just sterile sounding).

If Modartt were to use their physical modeling technology to extend further beyond the capabilities of a traditional piano, they wouldn't be emulating *specific* synths, much less locking themselves into the MIDI constraints imposed by a particular model.

It is as though it maybe has already embraced an agreement with MODARTT in part at least while it might take a staunch stance still against any proliferation of Hi-res CC#88 or Disklavier XP that as a format potentially can flood markets now, and, as soon as the new format MIDI 2.0 becomes released officially!  Its notable transition from ivory keys sold on acoustic pianos into modern plasticky digitals is like a mash of gerbil too unsavory for most customers to grasp fully or consume anything about it or its underpinnings.  (See forum topic: Kawai VPC1 faulty key weighting.)

Have some of you witnessed anything from Kawai at NAMM that touches on Hi-res CC#88 or MIDI 2.0 general acceptance?

Personally, I'm more than just marginally ecstatic about the re-release from Roland Corporation that has recently announced the Roland A-88MKII.  Along with its MIDI 2.0 capability, this keyboard controller might allow me to play virtually at the Kawai CR-40A or Kawai SK-EX  —just as if I were someone seated at one of the real pianos unlimited by the quantized restraints you experience with standard MIDI, and, if ever PIANOTEQ should model either!

welcome to the Pianoteq Studio Bundle owner club

It's the best investment I've made in my musical kit without a shadow of doubt.

Cheers!

Applied Acoustics Systems (AAS) might have just what you want! 

Just three (3) of its instrument modeling synths alone allow a musician to build his own new and unique musical instrument, be it string based, percussion based, or a synthesis of analog gear and a combination of all three  —in separate plugin instances, within your DAW of course:

1. String Studio VS-3, with it I may create anything —whether or not either bowed or plucked— from a cello, guitar, a combination of the both and even my very own acoustic pianos modeled inside the software.

2. Chromaphone 2, I use it to build percussion instruments, like drums and polyphonic instruments such as vibes and steel drums.  Definitely, with this software one might mangle those beyond any recognition, if you’re really into that sort of a thing!

3. Ultra Analog VA-3, this one I need to upgrade from its previous version.  It allows musical expression from your own versions of analog synthesizer gear.  Which any inside the software might build!

Just wanted to say, this thread (and a significant Black Friday discount) just sold me a bundle of all the AAS modeling instruments.

That's on top of PianoTeq Studio, and OrganTeq.  So, while I'd love to see some extended controls in here, my needs are probably met for a while!

I would love to know what you guys think.....

Short answer : no.

Modelling acoustic instruments is what pianoteq does and especially piano-like instruments. Modeling electronics is an entirely different ball game and a very red ocean.

I would like pianoteq to work on MPE playability. Imagine a pianomodel that responds to everything expressive E Osmose can do!

I would also be interested in surround sound. Especially for the organ-teq.

Perhaps the first even lacked a keyboard!

My first synth had a spongy no-action clicky keyboard, it was mono-phonic and all expression happened in real time by controlling knobs and sliders/switches.

That's the main issue I'd have with Pianoteq getting into modeling already well covered tech (they are simpler wave forms in genesis - becoming more complex with processing and more exciting with real time conrtols or automation). At present, with a digital piano controller, a lot of users will not have a mod wheel, or limited controls anyway - but.. it's still interesting to consider.. even if just because it's a third gen leap from making real sounds into digital ones, to making digital sounds real ;0)

So for that alone I'd be less crazy about a synth from the past getting modeled - but still would certainly be interested to see play it, if it happened - and would likely buy it - and likely it would blow me away too..

but I like using Pianoteq to replace synths anyway (Piet's posted piece is such a good demo for that kind of thing) - so from my perspective, an offshoot product by Modartt which is a complete modern music creation kit based on parameters gleaned from the creation of Pianoteq could be more of 'a thing' to my way of thinking. It could change names of parameters, make them even wider from reality, blend with conventional and unconventional analogs from the scene and that would seem like something I'd love to buy. Others on the market in that area don't yet excite me (unless tied to a controller type I don't wish to have to buy and so on) - but something about the way Pianoteq knows conventional keyboards and pushes the air around does.

Yes, I'd love if they model the famous KORG Z1 or Trinity V3 MOSS Board.... 

Should Pianoteq model another Pianos?

Yes, Yamaha CFX, Kawai SK-EX and Doutreligne pianos.

There are many advantages to the transparent piano project ostensible:

1. MODARTT maintains its own transparency just like it did before and since it got its Steinway and Sons authorizations.

2. Kawai also keeps its own and distinct reputation it has enjoyed worldwide and as a world renowned manufacturer of fine instruments  —in isolation, and on an island.

3. Generally, the struggling artists who are too poor to afford the expensive grand while they enjoy its sound, can have access to such a treasured tone and find it surprisingly affordable.

4. A major player and potential competitor has yet to sample successfully any transparent instrument making a VST.

5. The most inconspicuous of developers who model pianos is likely to have a proverbial foot in the door cordially opened to all of them only to enter eventually into an agreement on a much anticipated and highly sought after Shigeru Kawai SK-EX model.

6. Once competitors will have impressed each other, greatly.  Diplomacy among the industry rivals will ensue.  Befitting all, it’ll appear to paying customers!

7. A potentially useful outcome to piano players might result as Kawai can start to implement a MIDI resolution higher than that standard MIDI permits inside its controller and finally access to all of PIANOTEQ capabilities.

Kawai has advertised its CR-40A as having: “Incomparable beauty with quality tone.”