<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6899&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2026-03-09T10:29:01Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6899</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007178#p1007178"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have the Arturia Keylab 88 MK3, so the newer version. It has a Fatar keyboard, with hammer action, aftertouch, weighted keys. Is it similar enough to the MK2 that I can use the same velocity settings?<br />I guess that people who own the MK2 might have looked into the MK3. I know I would.<br /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>decredis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>These are the preferred velocity settings I&#039;ve settled on:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p><p>Or, for when I want silent pressing available:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 127; 0, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 127]</p><p>Without this sort of sigmoid-like curve, I find I can&#039;t get enough gradations of quiet, and can&#039;t easily get loud enough; this seems just about right for both, while also allowing a range of middling dynamics too.</p><p>EDIT: In case this is relevant to my choice of curve: my background is playing upright pianos most of my life until the past year when, until getting this Arturia, I&#039;ve been using a semi-weighted Native Instruments A61.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[perpetualbits]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=10803</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2026-03-09T10:29:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1007178#p1007178</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1003826#p1003826"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>hannesmenzel wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>With which hardware sided velocity curve did you create the velcurve for the Keylab (while having the 88 MK1 here)?</p></blockquote></div><p>88 MK2 here, but I found setting the controller to use a linear curve works the best if using the curve editor in Pianoteq. (Bass keys are still too &#039;hot&#039; but I think this is a function of using a non-weight-graded keybed like the Fatar TP/100LR in the MK2.) I don&#039;t know if you have tried to use Arturia&#039;s &quot;MIDI Control Center&quot; with the MK1, but if you can get it working it&#039;s a bit easier to edit hardware params like velocity curve.</p><p>Hope this helps</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[xixek]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=10451</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-09-25T17:06:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1003826#p1003826</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1003018#p1003018"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p><p>I hope some of you providing velocity curves for that keyboard are still around here so that I can ask a question about it:</p><p>With which hardware sided velocity curve did you create the velcurve for the Keylab (while having the 88 MK1 here)? I don&#039;t even know which one is the default one, but I suspect the default hardware velocity curve inside the Keylab was Nr. &quot;5&quot;, which is some kind of an exponential curve I guess. Or did you use the &quot;0&quot; (=linear) hardware curve?</p><p>Would be great if somebody&#039;s still around.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[hannesmenzel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=10359</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2025-07-16T17:23:00Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1003018#p1003018</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993929#p993929"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>decredis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>These are the preferred velocity settings I&#039;ve settled on:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p><p>Or, for when I want silent pressing available:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 127; 0, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 127]</p><p>Without this sort of sigmoid-like curve, I find I can&#039;t get enough gradations of quiet, and can&#039;t easily get loud enough; this seems just about right for both, while also allowing a range of middling dynamics too.</p><p>EDIT: In case this is relevant to my choice of curve: my background is playing upright pianos most of my life until the past year when, until getting this Arturia, I&#039;ve been using a semi-weighted Native Instruments A61.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve had this controller for over a year and not been super impressed with its use with Pianoteq. So glad I stumbled on this, it&#039;s a brand new controller! Thank you.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jrsquared]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=9334</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-11-22T22:52:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=993929#p993929</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992011#p992011"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Mark Zyla wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello,<br />I just purchased my Keylab 88mk II as well as Pianoteq. The only thing I discovered in regards to velocity was the Calibration section which I did. How do I enter the velocity numbers that are listed in this post?<br />Thx<br />Mark</p></blockquote></div><p>10 months later... I found myself in the same situation - new Keylab 88mk II + Pianoteq.<br />I stumbled upon the solution, so I&#039;m posting it here in case anyone else needs it:</p><p>Clicking on the &quot;VELOCITY&quot; title bar opens a menu, that has Copy &amp; Paste options near the top.<br />I clicked &quot;Copy&quot; and found the following text on the clipboard:<br />Velocity = [0, 127; 0, 127]</p><p>So I understood that I have to copy this line from the OP in the browser:<br /></p><div class="quotebox"><blockquote><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p></blockquote></div><p>and then click Paste in the Pianoteq menu.</p><p>Voila!</p><p>Thx @decredis, the keyboard now feels and and sounds much better!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[danz]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=9259</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2023-08-22T17:49:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=992011#p992011</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986529#p986529"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />I just purchased my Keylab 88mk II as well as Pianoteq. The only thing I discovered in regards to velocity was the Calibration section which I did. How do I enter the velocity numbers that are listed in this post?<br />Thx<br />Mark</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Mark Zyla]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8705</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-11-26T23:55:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=986529#p986529</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963212#p963212"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>groovy wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>decredis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>These are the preferred velocity settings I&#039;ve settled on:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p><p>Or, for when I want silent pressing available:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 127; 0, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 127]</p></blockquote></div><p>Hm, seem to be the same curves (just one interpolation more at 113; 118).</p></blockquote></div><p>Ah, that interpolation wasn’t even intended! The only intended difference was the very first point: 0,1 vs 0,0, for when I want velocity 0 to produce ppp vs silence.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[decredis]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6651</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-31T15:18:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963212#p963212</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963179#p963179"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>decredis wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>These are the preferred velocity settings I&#039;ve settled on:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p><p>Or, for when I want silent pressing available:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 127; 0, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 127]</p></blockquote></div><p>Hm, seem to be the same curves (just one interpolation more at 113; 118).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[groovy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-30T21:35:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963179#p963179</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Arturia Keylab 88 Mk2]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963145#p963145"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>These are the preferred velocity settings I&#039;ve settled on:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 113, 127; 1, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 118, 127]</p><p>Or, for when I want silent pressing available:</p><p>Velocity = [0, 14, 27, 37, 52, 72, 98, 127; 0, 8, 24, 41, 65, 85, 106, 127]</p><p>Without this sort of sigmoid-like curve, I find I can&#039;t get enough gradations of quiet, and can&#039;t easily get loud enough; this seems just about right for both, while also allowing a range of middling dynamics too.</p><p>EDIT: In case this is relevant to my choice of curve: my background is playing upright pianos most of my life until the past year when, until getting this Arturia, I&#039;ve been using a semi-weighted Native Instruments A61.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[decredis]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6651</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-29T16:28:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963145#p963145</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
