<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6880&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2019-10-27T19:30:04Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6880</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963109#p963109"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>whibble wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Amen Ptah Ra wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I’m on a lookout for something in MIDI High Resolution Velocity Prefix control change number eighty-eight (88) note-on capabilities, note-off velocities values (1 thru 127), and an attractive optional stand or cabinet including pedals to make it portable.</p></blockquote></div><p>I like the idea of hi-res velocity. Does PT respond to that? Realistically I think we can generate 10 bit resolution out of the keyscan (packaged as a 14 bit MIDI message of course). </p><p>Could you clarify a bit more&nbsp; the note-on / note-off capabilities you mention.</p><p>Stand, case, pedals can be done. Would you want built-in speakers?</p></blockquote></div><p>The forum topic High Resolution MIDI Velocity (CC#88) may clarify a lot.&nbsp; (I posted to it.)&nbsp; I’m providing a link to it, <a href="https://www.forum-pianoteq.com/viewtopic.php?id=5897">https://www.forum-pianoteq.com/viewtopic.php?id=5897</a>.</p><p>Speakers are preferable.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Amen Ptah Ra]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5334</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-27T19:30:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963109#p963109</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963093#p963093"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There is a possible issue with the license... As long as I know, the software is not transferable, what happens if someone wants to sell the instrument?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[marcos daniel]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4155</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-27T06:11:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963093#p963093</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963088#p963088"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that the Raspberry Pi is limited to 22050 or 28000 internal samples with a max polyphony of 48.</p><p>The main selling point, for me at least, would be the ability to control Pianoteq (internal one or an external one) from the keyboard itself, and a fast boot time. You could map rotary encoders with OLED screens to each Pianoteq option, bonus points if you make them remappable for other VST&#039;s to use. So basically I&#039;m saying pay attention to the UI design. Since that would be the only point in buying your product. Since a &quot;standalone&quot; keyboard can be made easily with anything running Linux, from a Raspberry Pi to an Intel NUC. But the ability to change every option of Pianoteq, on the fly, with an easy to use user interface, would be game-changing.</p><p>Cool idea, good luck <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[xhivo]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6674</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-27T01:50:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963088#p963088</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963040#p963040"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>whibble wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Urs Zimmermann wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That&#039;s what I dream of. Lightweight, sturdy, stage-ready piano with 88-key hammer action and speakers that can be used as monitoring. Button for volume and selection of pre-programmed sounds. Outputs for PA and headphone and of course sustain pedal. Depending on the quality of the keyboard price around Euro 2000</p></blockquote></div><p>Excellent - I hope we can fulfil your dreams!</p><p>Lightweight - agreed. Speakers - interesting. It can lead people to think of it as a lower-end product by having speakers. How important is this to you? Outputs / headphones - tick.</p><p>That&#039;s a beefy price. How about the construction - are you expecting metal / plastic? Plastic will lead to a more lightweight product of course.</p></blockquote></div><p>For me, speakers have to be. The latency of remote monitors bothers me. Otherwise as robust and at the same time as light as possible. That can be plastic. I imagine a &quot;Studiologic SL88 Grand&quot; with sound from Pianotheq and integrated speakers. The keyboard may be slightly better quality than Studiologic.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Urs Zimmermann]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5276</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-24T12:26:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963040#p963040</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963028#p963028"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Urs Zimmermann wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>That&#039;s what I dream of. Lightweight, sturdy, stage-ready piano with 88-key hammer action and speakers that can be used as monitoring. Button for volume and selection of pre-programmed sounds. Outputs for PA and headphone and of course sustain pedal. Depending on the quality of the keyboard price around Euro 2000</p></blockquote></div><p>Excellent - I hope we can fulfil your dreams!</p><p>Lightweight - agreed. Speakers - interesting. It can lead people to think of it as a lower-end product by having speakers. How important is this to you? Outputs / headphones - tick.</p><p>That&#039;s a beefy price. How about the construction - are you expecting metal / plastic? Plastic will lead to a more lightweight product of course.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[whibble]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6668</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-23T20:32:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963028#p963028</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963027#p963027"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Amen Ptah Ra wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I’m on a lookout for something in MIDI High Resolution Velocity Prefix control change number eighty-eight (88) note-on capabilities, note-off velocities values (1 thru 127), and an attractive optional stand or cabinet including pedals to make it portable.</p></blockquote></div><p>I like the idea of hi-res velocity. Does PT respond to that? Realistically I think we can generate 10 bit resolution out of the keyscan (packaged as a 14 bit MIDI message of course). </p><p>Could you clarify a bit more&nbsp; the note-on / note-off capabilities you mention.</p><p>Stand, case, pedals can be done. Would you want built-in speakers?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[whibble]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6668</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-23T20:28:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=963027#p963027</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962960#p962960"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I’m on a lookout for something in MIDI High Resolution Velocity Prefix control change number eighty-eight (88) note-on capabilities, note-off velocities values (1 thru 127), and an attractive optional stand or cabinet including pedals to make it portable.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Amen Ptah Ra]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5334</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-19T21:33:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962960#p962960</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962959#p962959"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s what I dream of. Lightweight, sturdy, stage-ready piano with 88-key hammer action and speakers that can be used as monitoring. Button for volume and selection of pre-programmed sounds. Outputs for PA and headphone and of course sustain pedal. Depending on the quality of the keyboard price around Euro 2000</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Urs Zimmermann]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5276</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-19T20:17:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962959#p962959</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pianoteq as a standalone instrument]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962957#p962957"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m building a Pianoteq standalone instrument using a Raspberry Pi mini-computer and wondered if this were for sale what features would be essential? </p><p>I&#039;m thinking of a stage piano enclosure with 88 note hammer action keyboard and without speakers (or would these be desirable?)</p><p>Some thoughts / questions of mine:<br />- High quality audio outputs jacks - is balanced desirable / needed?<br />- Polyphony - how much is enough?<br />- Knobs to control what features?<br />- Price?</p><p>What sort of things are essential / nice to have / ... or even definitely not needed?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[whibble]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6668</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-10-19T19:42:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=962957#p962957</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
