<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=687</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:12:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5326#p5326</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Gilles wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Very nice indeed. The sound of the Walter seems in fact more suited to harpsichord music than later pianoforte works.</p><p>Listening form this site to Debussy&#039;s Clair de Lune on Ivory and comparing it to Hugh Sung&#039;s version on C3, there is no competition for this work in need of more resonance! Ptq3 wins hand down!</p><p>I think Kaila Rochelle should probably re-record some of her pieces with Ptq3. The Brahms Intermezzo Op.119 No.2 sounds a lot dated and very dry in comparison.</p><br /><p>...Listening still, I think for example the Soler Sonata No. 84 in D Major has probably been re-recorded with Ptq3. Much better sound in my opinion.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello to the forum members,&nbsp; </p><p>This is Kenneth Babb, project manager for specialneedsinmusic.com. <br />I have worked with my pianist colleague Kaila Rochelle for about 12 years or so.</p><p>I would like to thank everyone for your interest and kind words regarding the Scarlatti Sonata K3 L378 PianoTeq Walter instrument and other Pianoteq recordings on our piano web page. It&#039;s wonderful to have this objective feedback about the work we have posted.</p><p>The Scarlatti K3/L378 was originally created on Ivory. I experimented with <br />a &#039;hybrid instrument&#039; mix of Ivory and our Roland RD-700 midi keyboard Harpsichord instrument.&nbsp; Pianoteq is a recent discovery for us, started working with it in Jan 2009. I didn&#039;t get around to trying the Walter instrument until Pianoteq 3 came out. The Walter immediately &#039;sounded right&#039; for the Scarlatti.&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p>I&#039;m eager to try the Walter with some Mozart pieces that we have up in Ivory and the Pianoteq 2 Bechstein. </p><p>Yes, the Soler Sonata No. 84 in D Major was &#039;re-recorded&#039; with the Pianoteq 3 Erard instrument. The Fantasia Baetica too. The Debussy Clair de Lune &#039;Pro Tools&#039; session has been lost, so no choice but to redo the piece. The Pianoteq 3 Erard will probably be the instrument of choice.</p><p>I just re-worked the &#039;space&#039; for The Brahms Intermezzo Op.119 No.2 (posted July 3 2009). The &#039;sustain pedal&#039; still bothers me to no end, but the space seems to work much better now.&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p>The single most annoying problem we&#039;ve had with Ivory is the sustain pedal. When Kaila first tried the Pianoteq, she immediately loved the response that allows &#039;her expression&#039; to come through. Philippe Guillaume and Julien Pommier have the really captured the &#039;behavior&#039; of a piano in their software.&nbsp; </p><p>-Kb<br />-</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kbpnoteq)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5326#p5326</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5065#p5065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You can adjust the sound signal dynamic and piano itself dinamic on Pianoteq. Maybe this could help get closer to the original piano recording.</p><p>BNut a limitation I think was a problem was the lack of true fortissimos. The V3 version corrected that but only for C3. All the other models still lack good fortissimos.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5065#p5065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5063#p5063</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I just loaded the De Falla piece recorded on a real piano. 18MB and it loaded very fast at a sustained 4,6 Mbs.</p><p>I was curious to compare it with the pianoteq version and it is quite amazing to hear how similar it sounds while being a bit different (no cheating here! the pianoteq version is 30MB, being a 320kbps mp3)</p><p>The real piano has definitively greater dynamics here though.</p><p>Really great playing!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Gilles)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5063#p5063</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5062#p5062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Very interesthing.</p><p>The dowload for those mp3, from her page, were very slow.&nbsp; Anybody noticed that too?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5062#p5062</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5060#p5060</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Listening still, I think for example the Soler Sonata No. 84 in D Major has probably been re-recorded with Ptq3. Much better sound in my opinion.</p><p>Same goes for De Falla Fantasia Baetica. A longer very pianistic piece where it is easy to forget that it is not a real piano...</p><p>That&#039;s great piano playing altogether anyway. Bravo!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Gilles)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5060#p5060</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5059#p5059</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Very nice indeed. The sound of the Walter seems in fact more suited to harpsichord music than later pianoforte works.</p><p>Listening form this site to Debussy&#039;s Clair de Lune on Ivory and comparing it to Hugh Sung&#039;s version on C3, there is no competition for this work in need of more resonance! Ptq3 wins hand down!</p><p>I think Kaila Rochelle should probably re-record some of her pieces with Ptq3. The Brahms Intermezzo Op.119 No.2 sounds a lot dated and very dry in comparison.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Gilles)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5059#p5059</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A beautiful recording with the Walter pianoforte]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5057#p5057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />we recently discovered a beautiful Scarlatti Sonata played by Kaila Rochelle with the Walter add-on, so we added it to our audio pages:<br /><a href="http://www.pianoteq.com/listen?select=historical">http://www.pianoteq.com/listen?select=historical</a><br />We just wanted to share this with you <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>More about Kaila Rochelle:<br /><a href="http://specialneedsinmusic.com/piano.html">http://specialneedsinmusic.com/piano.html</a><br />with many other beautiful recordings!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Philippe Guillaume)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=5057#p5057</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
