<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Feature suggestion: Scala file direct keyboard mapping]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=6512&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2019-04-25T18:51:55Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=6512</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Feature suggestion: Scala file direct keyboard mapping]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=960072#p960072"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I find it very annoying that Pianoteq sorts my Scala files from lowest to highest without giving me an option to reorder the scale.</p><p>Example: The Euler Fokker Genus 3*3*3*7*7<br />! EFG33377.scl<br />!<br />3*3*3*7*7 EFG<br />12<br />!<br />1/1<br />9/8<br />147/128<br />1323/1024<br />21/16<br />189/128<br />3/2<br />49/32<br />27/16<br />441/256<br />7/4<br />63/32<br />2/1</p><p>With the so called &quot;linear&quot; mapping, Pianoteq puts the 2/1 as the second note (1/1) and greys out the 64/63 note so that it is uneditable!</p><p>EDIT: After failing to move the duplicate 1/1 to the last degree, I discovered that I had to manually edit the second 1/1 to a 2/1 to make it jump back to its intended position at the top of the scale.</p><p>I understand why Modartt needs to have all the pitches sorted ascendingly, but is it a tall order to have a mapping in the keyboard mappings menu called &quot;From Scala File&quot; that preserves the order of pitches in the Scala file?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Literal76]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1983</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2019-04-25T18:51:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=960072#p960072</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
