<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - historical intruments]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=640&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2009-05-26T00:10:37Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=640</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: historical intruments]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4604#p4604"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I love the variety in Pianoteq, and the harpsichords, with their incredibly rich timbre, are great for making new instruments, like <a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?file=ElectricLute.fxp">this one</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-26T00:10:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4604#p4604</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: historical intruments]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4596#p4596"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>m.tarenskeen wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I saw a thread on this forum. At the moment of writing this I can&#039;t find it so I just start a new topic.</p><p>Some people were complaining about the uselessness of the harpsichords and other historic instruments.</p></blockquote></div><p>It was <a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/viewtopic.php?id=606">this one</a>. I found it easily using the search function since I remembered it contained the word &quot;utterly&quot; which I had to look up in a dictionary <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jope]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-25T14:59:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4596#p4596</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[historical intruments]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4592#p4592"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I saw a thread on this forum. At the moment of writing this I can&#039;t find it so I just start a new topic.</p><p>Some people were complaining about the uselessness of the harpsichords and other historic instruments.</p><p>But for me, these free add-ons were one of the reasons for me to buy the full version of Pianoteq. I always like people who do things because they believe in it, rather than because there is big market for it. I AM interested in historic instruments, but I don&#039;t have the money and the room to have different harpsichords, hammerklavieren, and grand pianos in my living room. Pianoteq gives my a chance to try Bach and Mozart with a historically adequate sound. I like it !</p><p>I just want to say: Keep up the good work Pianoteq People!&nbsp; </p><p>A request/suggestion for future projects: It would be really nice if you would be able to catch the subtleties of smaller and intimate historical keyboards like for example spinet, virginal and clavichord in a Pianoteq fysical model. Especially the clavichord, which was one of Bach favourite instruments,&nbsp; I would like to see.</p><p>Like for example this one:</p><p><a href="http://www.haendelhaus.de/de/Ausstellungen/Musikinstrumenten-Ausstellung/#Clavichord">http://www.haendelhaus.de/de/Ausstellun...Clavichord</a></p><br /><p>-- </p><p>Martin</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[m.tarenskeen]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1003</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-05-25T09:01:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4592#p4592</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
