Modartt user forum - The "wood" component

Re: The "wood" component

2009-06-11T06:39:12Z

Yamahas are bright - I had a G2 for 25 years, and never really liked the brightness - and it got worse with time of course. By the time I sold it, it needed new hammers, but couldn't keep it because I downsized into a condo where the neighbours would have thrown me out.

Maybe I like the Pianoteq sound as it originate in Europe, and is likely closer to the European grand sound than others. I personally prefer the German grand sound - a bit mellower, but this like anything is personal preference.

Re: The "wood" component

2009-06-11T02:47:32Z

Exactamente.
I spent a month getting my pedal chops back, but I go to the DAW instead of my Upright since that's what I use live, and it's great to have an instrument that inspires me to practice and compose.

I could care less how much the Pro version costs. The only thing I am missing from having the perfect Piano, is to slightly detune ( stretch )the upper Octaves while the other registers remain unaffected.

I am confident I can get a better grip on the EP's too when the time comes.

Having a perfectly tuned Grand Piano is always nice, but having some slight imperfections and a little more wood seems like an easy tweak for the Pro Model.

The "wood" component

2009-05-20T03:15:36Z

I've just got back from my parent's place and was able to spend a lot of time with an upright and also a grand (mid sized yamaha) that I used for a mini performance. And coming back to pianoteq, I started to tweak my main preset to a much brighter sound.. The yamaha surely had an effect on my, besides I like the yamaha sound anyway.

One thing I can't seem to get right is, though, the "wood" part of the sound. I'm usually quite good at pinpointing what needs to be changed, doing sound design and all.. but for this, I have no idea. It's so subtle, yet is so present in a piano sound.

A good thing I realized though, was how easy it was to transition back to an acoustic from PT3. For the first time, I felt as if the digital counterpart was some distant relative of an acoustic. And so, going from PT3 to an acoustic was sort of like going from one acoustic to another, much like going from an upright to a grand. I was also surprised at how much tweaking PT3 had trained my ears. My ears were so sensitive to the how the grand was responding to my touch, that it was extremely easy to control.

Still by no means a perfect alternative, but what PT3 has accomplished is amazing. Now I want to get me an upright and play more! I think this is the point. Whether PT3 assists in practice, production, or whatever the context, if the end result is that you are more motivated about creating music or bettering yourself as a musician, then the instrument has served (is serving) its purpose.