<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq + Studiologic (NUMA or NUMA NERO)]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=610</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Pianoteq + Studiologic (NUMA or NUMA NERO).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq + Studiologic (NUMA or NUMA NERO)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4309#p4309</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bartleby wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Do these FATAR mechanisms efficiently work with Pianoteq ? I be grateful to have your opinion on this matter. Thanks in advance.</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, it&#039;s a very nice action but I don&#039;t think its velocity sensing is quite as good as e.g. a Yamaha and it is a pretty firm touch, something like Schubert&#039;s 3rd Impromptu in Gb Major is pretty taxing on the Fatar.&nbsp; Also unless they&#039;ve reworked the firmware since the initial release last year, the midi implementation is a bit rough-and-ready and sends a lot of unnecessary traffic when buttons are pressed.</p><p>Best//Neil</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (NeilCraig)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4309#p4309</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pianoteq + Studiologic (NUMA or NUMA NERO)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4308#p4308</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Do these FATAR mechanisms efficiently work with Pianoteq ? I be grateful to have your opinion on this matter. Thanks in advance.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bartleby)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=4308#p4308</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
