<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Emulating the sound of Garritan CFX Concert Grand]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5933&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2018-09-02T14:18:02Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=5933</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Emulating the sound of Garritan CFX Concert Grand]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956194#p956194"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I am SO VERY HAPPY too with my Pianoteq, since one year.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Yangyang]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5405</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-09-02T14:18:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956194#p956194</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Emulating the sound of Garritan CFX Concert Grand]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956185#p956185"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I actually rendered the wav file as 192Khz then converted the mp3, but I think I lost the sampling rate... When I listen to the wav the sound of the piano is more better and warmer... but I think my emulations are still experimental... I need many hours of tweaking.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Nor]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5335</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-09-01T17:44:27Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956185#p956185</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Emulating the sound of Garritan CFX Concert Grand]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956184#p956184"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When playing, do you notice a difference in sound quality when using &quot;internal processing&quot; (options&gt;performance tab) of say 48kHz vs 192kHz?</p><p>For each test, your &quot;sample rate&quot; (options&gt;devices) should match the above rates, respectively. That is 48kHz in both tabs. Or 192kHz in both tabs.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[music_guy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5402</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-09-01T16:57:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956184#p956184</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Emulating the sound of Garritan CFX Concert Grand]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956182#p956182"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m so VERY HAPPY with upgrading to PRO today!</p><p>I just tried to emulate the CFX trough some tweaks on Bluthner and Grand YC5 using the &#039;Note Edit&#039; feature. I exported using &quot;High Quality Settings / 192Khz / 32bits&quot;. You can preview the two mp3 files below: </p><p>BLUTHNER<br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iBDwuXo6y_9oQud-EustyUWoLZkzqaRO">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iBDwu...WoLZkzqaRO</a> </p><p>GRAND YC5<br /><a href="https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GScEdFUdGft-GXciFn6X4o8cVlABthEn">https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GScEd...8cVlABthEn</a></p><p>I think the YC5 approach the sound of CFX more than Bluthner, if I&#039;m wrong please correct me.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Nor]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5335</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-09-01T13:42:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=956182#p956182</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
