<![CDATA[Modartt user forum - O Pianoteq 6.1.1 opera melhor com drive ASIO4all. Por quê?]]> https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=5673 Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:30:28 +0000 PunBB <![CDATA[Re: O Pianoteq 6.1.1 opera melhor com drive ASIO4all. Por quê?]]> https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953822#p953822 Neither M-Audio nor Behringer are known for very good drivers... try a better interface?

]]> Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:30:28 +0000 https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953822#p953822 <![CDATA[Re: O Pianoteq 6.1.1 opera melhor com drive ASIO4all. Por quê?]]> https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953821#p953821 EvilDragon:

I know this is strange, but on my computer (Dell, Intel Core I7) this is what is happening. And I tested it with two different interfaces: with an M-Audio and a Behringer.
Because of this, I am using the computer's handset output for the reference monitors.

]]> Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:24:01 +0000 https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953821#p953821 <![CDATA[Re: O Pianoteq 6.1.1 opera melhor com drive ASIO4all. Por quê?]]> https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953816#p953816 Nope, in great majority of cases an external audio interface with its own ASIO drivers will work better and with lower latency.

]]> Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:44:50 +0000 https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953816#p953816 <![CDATA[O Pianoteq 6.1.1 opera melhor com drive ASIO4all. Por quê?]]> https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953807#p953807 Does Pianoteq 6.1.1 work better with the onboard (realtek) board and the ASIO4all drive than with other external audio interfaces and the original ASIO drive? Why does it happen?

I did this test and checked using the same sampling and buffering rates. What will be the explanation?

]]> Sun, 15 Apr 2018 19:54:46 +0000 https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=953807#p953807