<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq support up to 16kHz only?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5523&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2018-02-12T14:54:18Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=5523</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq support up to 16kHz only?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952651#p952651"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I exported the blues demo to a 48kHz/24bit wav, just for fits and giggles, and it shows a continuous spectrum right up to 24kHz. However, one has to choose appropriate FFT settings, lest very high frequencies are hidden from the spectrum. Also the SNR drops below -100dB quickly for frequencies above 10kHz. As you said, there&#039;s not _that_ much going on in the very high frequency ranges.</p><p>(Side note: given that any real-life recording rig won&#039;t give you much better SNR than say, 80 or 90dB, all sample libraries would have to show for in those upper ranges is... noise; microphone and amplifier noise mainly. Which makes sample libs using more than 44/16 for sample storage a bit ridiculous.)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kalessin]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3808</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-02-12T14:54:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952651#p952651</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq support up to 16kHz only?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952646#p952646"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Pianos don&#039;t really have a lot important overtones above 16 kHz anyways...</p><br /><p>Also, I can see partials above 16 kHz being present on the sonogram. Example:</p><p><span class="postimg"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/TnPssae.png" alt="https://i.imgur.com/TnPssae.png" title="https://i.imgur.com/TnPssae.png"/></span></p><br /><p>So no, it&#039;s not cut off at 16 kHz.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-02-11T11:19:37Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952646#p952646</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pianoteq support up to 16kHz only?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952643#p952643"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I find audio file exported by PTQ has a cut-off at 16 kHz. No matter what kind of format (WAV, FLAC, MP3) or bit-depth or sample rate there is, the cut-off always exists. Interestingly, the equalizer window shows the highest frequency is also 16kHz. Is that implies PTQ simulates piano&#039;s overtone under 16kHz only? If not, does PTQ&#039;s maxium internal sample rate is 32kHz? But the item in option window can be set up to 48kHz instead. Did I do anything wrong?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[say yes]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5770</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-02-11T04:32:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952643#p952643</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
