<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - latency spike]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=5463&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2018-01-07T07:59:48Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=5463</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: latency spike]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952223#p952223"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Running a web browser in the background and doing audio processing with intention of low latency is never a good thing. You should try disabling the network on Surface if you wanna run Pianoteq without hitches (like completely, disable device in Device Manager).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-01-07T07:59:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952223#p952223</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: latency spike]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952218#p952218"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I had been having trouble getting low latencies with Pianoteq while avoiding snaps and crackles on my window surface Pro 4, especially when I am running a web browser or some other program in the background. Up until this change that I made listed below, I had been stuck at running at 29 KHz for sampling, and keeping a fairly large buffer, such as 384. Anything below this would cause pauses, pops, and crackles. Even just setting the battery to &quot;high&quot; did not make that much improvement.</p><p>I then watched sections of a video on a website called Surface Pro Audio, and made the changes that he suggests:</p><p><a href="http://surfaceproaudio.com/surface-pro-2017-audio-performance-reliability-music-production/">http://surfaceproaudio.com/surface-pro-...roduction/</a></p><p>This is a fairly long video, but thankfully, it comes with a table of contents. The heart of the matter starts at seven minutes 37 seconds under &quot;tweaking windows&quot;. He gives some changes to the power settings, and other changes that are only possible after making a modification in the Windows registry.</p><p>After I did what he said, I found a significant improvement. I am now able to run Pianoteq at 48 kHz with a buffer of only 64. Even with the sustain pedal held down, and a five-microphone instrument preset, I rarely push past 40% of the processor as seen on the graph of the performance section of the Pianoteq options. For me, this is fantastic (and I am convinced that it even sounds better and more musical and realistic than what I was getting with the sampling frequency of only 29 kHz – whether it makes any difference to do 44 kHz or 48 kHz is debatable, as CD-quality audio sounds pretty darn good to me, but I was in fact able to push Pianoteq up to 48 kHz without any problems). So far, I have heard no snaps, no pops, and no crackles.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dklein]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4749</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-01-07T01:23:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952218#p952218</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[latency spike]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952209#p952209"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Greetings everyone,</p><p>I just purchased Pianoteq 6 and it sounds great and works fine ( = no latency) most of the time, but when I&#039;m playing a lot of notes at the same time I sometimes have latency spikes - it is especially noticable on the right hand chords (is it the proper english word?) of the chopin etude 12. </p><p>I&#039;m using ASIO4ALL with either the motherboard soundcard or also one in my GPU, with no differences. I tried different buffer sizes (currently 64 samples), different sampling frequencies, enables/disables multicore processing, to no avail. I have a i5-7400 so&nbsp; I don&#039;t think that&#039;s the problem (it&#039;s never used at 100% anyway). <br />Any ideas? Could it be my keyboard who is at fault here? I have a Casio privia Px-135</p><p>Cheers,<br />gus</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[gus]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5730</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2018-01-06T20:14:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=952209#p952209</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
