<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Harpsichord thread]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=544&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2009-03-05T11:28:53Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=544</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Harpsichord thread]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3726#p3726"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I hereby take this to a new thread since it has gotten a bit off topic in the original place.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hm, I&#039;m finding harpsichords way better than any rompler sample, they cut through the mix really really well.</p></blockquote></div><p>Maybe it depends on the music. Once when I had to use a harpsi for a musical production, I ended up using the stock Kontakt 3 sample which really worked much better than PTQ&#039;s.</p><p>The sound I am looking for can be heard here:<br /><a href="http://www.cembalo-fuchs.de/html_gb/flamen.html">http://www.cembalo-fuchs.de/html_gb/flamen.html</a><br />(also check the other models like german, french etc.)</p><p>I cannot get that &#039;open&#039;, fresh and &#039;3D&#039; sound from PTQ. Can you? If so, post an example, and I shall be converted and henceforth only pray to thee <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Gizmao]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=869</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2009-03-05T11:28:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=3726#p3726</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
