<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=5331</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Hummel's 1829 tuning.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951208#p951208</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, placing the scalas in Other files makes things a bit simpler, thanks Don! Actually that&#039;s given me an idea. When I get a few spare moments at the piano I&#039;ll think about preparing a midi file that cycles through all the keys, specifically for testing tuning systems. There doesn&#039;t seem to be anything like that in the uploaded files, which is quite a surprise.<br />Hummel 1829 comes across as a pretty robust general-purpose system to me. Of course, there is no such thing as a &#039;perfect&#039; tuning. B major seems to me to be very slightly &#039;off&#039; in 1829, but not disturbingly so. IMO it&#039;s a price worth paying, to have that generally richer and more satisfying sound that I&#039;ve already mentioned. Good old Hummel. He was no slouch as a composer, and he obviously knew a thing or two about tuning pianos too. The second temperament is even closer to equal, but still with something of that softening effect. Apparently it&#039;s based on the &#039;second bearing plan&#039;, which sounds as if it might be some sort of civil engineering project, but presumably it&#039;s a treatise on instrument tuning (my internet search on the subject has, so far, not yielded anything). I can&#039;t decide which system is &#039;better&#039;, but they certainly deserve to take their place in my &#039;virtual hall of pianos&#039;.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dazric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951208#p951208</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951185#p951185</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>@Jake: I will upload a couple of fxps based on one of the default Grotrian presets so that you can &#039;test drive&#039; the tuning to your own satisfaction, rather than listening to my random doodlings. There is a &#039;hummel 2&#039; as well, which I haven&#039;t had much chance to try out, but there are some subtle differences there. In the fxps I have deliberately not altered anything except the tuning, because of course there are a number of other variables which can affect the sound of a piano. If you don&#039;t have the scala files, you will need to download them from <a href="http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/downloads.html#scales">http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/dow...tml#scales</a> - when you have them, check in the &#039;advanced tuning&#039; option to see that they have loaded correctly.</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;ve placed them (Hummel and Hummel2)&nbsp; in Other Files:<br /><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php</a><br /><i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (DonSmith)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2017 01:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951185#p951185</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951172#p951172</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@Jake: I will upload a couple of fxps based on one of the default Grotrian presets so that you can &#039;test drive&#039; the tuning to your own satisfaction, rather than listening to my random doodlings. There is a &#039;hummel 2&#039; as well, which I haven&#039;t had much chance to try out, but there are some subtle differences there. In the fxps I have deliberately not altered anything except the tuning, because of course there are a number of other variables which can affect the sound of a piano. If you don&#039;t have the scala files, you will need to download them from <a href="http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/downloads.html#scales">http://www.huygens-fokker.org/scala/dow...tml#scales</a> - when you have them, check in the &#039;advanced tuning&#039; option to see that they have loaded correctly.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dazric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2017 14:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951172#p951172</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951166#p951166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hi, just wondering if there are any enthusiasts out there for this nearly-but-not-quite-equal temperament? (The scala file name is just &#039;hummel&#039;). From time to time I like to try alternative tunings on the modern pianos as well as the historical instruments, and the other day I came across hummel and decided to load it into one of my Grotrian presets. I have to say, I really like it! It&#039;s a subtle difference, but it seems to bring out an extra richness and depth of character when compared with standard equal temperament. Well, that&#039;s just what I think. If you have Standard or Pro, give it a try. If you don&#039;t like it, at least you can quickly revert back to your preferred tuning!</p></blockquote></div><p>Could you post a sound demo that would let us hear this tuning?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jake Johnson)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951166#p951166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951154#p951154</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the end, it comes down to what piece of music you are playing, and in what key you are playing it.&nbsp; If a given tuning system happens to &quot;lock in&quot; for you, then so much the better, and I am hopeful you will continue enjoying it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcfelice88keys)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951154#p951154</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hummel's 1829 tuning]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951151#p951151</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just wondering if there are any enthusiasts out there for this nearly-but-not-quite-equal temperament? (The scala file name is just &#039;hummel&#039;). From time to time I like to try alternative tunings on the modern pianos as well as the historical instruments, and the other day I came across hummel and decided to load it into one of my Grotrian presets. I have to say, I really like it! It&#039;s a subtle difference, but it seems to bring out an extra richness and depth of character when compared with standard equal temperament. Well, that&#039;s just what I think. If you have Standard or Pro, give it a try. If you don&#039;t like it, at least you can quickly revert back to your preferred tuning!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dazric)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=951151#p951151</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
