<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Oddities about the Unison detune Note Edit pane?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4815&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2016-12-19T18:50:20Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4815</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Oddities about the Unison detune Note Edit pane?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946138#p946138"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I should have compared the length of the decay with and without wide unisons. Somehow, subjectively, the decay just seemed a little long with the widely detuned unisons. I&#039;ll need to study the explanation and physics of the relationship between the unison width and initial decay. Thanks, Philippe.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-19T18:50:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946138#p946138</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Oddities about the Unison detune Note Edit pane?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946134#p946134"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>(EDIT: I edited this post after experimenting with wide unison settings and the Unison Balance pane.)</p><p>1. I may not be thinking correctly, but shouldn&#039;t a high setting for a unison detune make the notes decay faster, given the absence of coupling? (Now, even with an absurd setting such as +1000 for a set of unisons, the unisons beat rapidly, but decay slowly. Of course, one can correct this with the Impedance setting for the note, but it&#039;s strange to hear the long, precisely beating unisons when editing in the Unison pane.)</p></blockquote></div><p>Well, it should indeed because of the reason you mention, and it does. Take for example middle C of the D4 played at velocity 84; with normal tuning, the sound lasts more or less 18 seconds, whereas with unison width = 20 it lasts only 9 seconds. </p><p>When the Unison width is 1, the initial decay is fast (direct sound) while the second part of the sound (after sound) has a much slower decay. The decay rate of the detuned unison lies somewhere between those two decays, and does not vary with time.</p><p>(note that the maximum value for Unison width is 20, I wonder where you got the 1000 from.)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-19T15:12:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946134#p946134</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Oddities about the Unison detune Note Edit pane?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946128#p946128"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>(EDIT: I edited this post after experimenting with wide unison settings and the Unison Balance pane.)</p><p>1. I may not be thinking correctly, but shouldn&#039;t a high setting for a unison detune make the notes decay faster, given the absence of coupling? (Now, even with an absurd setting such as +1000 for a set of unisons, the unisons beat rapidly, but decay slowly. Of course, one can correct this with the Impedance setting for the note, but it&#039;s strange to hear the long, precisely beating unisons when editing in the Unison pane.)</p><p>2. In the model, there appears to be a oddity when the detuning is wide. I&#039;m not sure that there is a limit to the amount of detuning, but you must use the Unison Balance NE pane to hear extreme changes, and then the note sounds thin, like a rattle. When one unison is far off pitch, should there be beating? Instead, won&#039;t the unison sound as a separate, distinct pitch? I&#039;ve heard a piano with a unison that was so badly off in the tenor that I thought the hammer was hitting two sets of unison strings at once. Why would anyone want this extreme detuning? Well, to create a very badly maintained piano, at least one in which the unisons were more off than they can now be set.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2016-12-19T01:37:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=946128#p946128</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
