<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - pianoteq basic: just a fxp player]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4595</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in pianoteq basic: just a fxp player.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: pianoteq basic: just a fxp player]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944017#p944017</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>SteveKK wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>GRB wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>SteveKK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello,</p><p>what do you think about a Pianoteq version with a very straight pipeline?</p><p>Just a fxp player with only Device preferences and velocity curves.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Personally I think the Pro version is that already.&nbsp; As I understand it, an FXP file has to be based on a certain instrument in the first place.&nbsp; I don&#039;t see where the presets get in the way of what you might want.&nbsp; I doubt there would be much value or interest in a scaled down interface.&nbsp; I think a good light weight action with top notch amplification and speakers built in is more urgent.&nbsp; Also probably a high performance tablet computer would be most desirable.&nbsp; One that could power the Pianoteq and display music pages at the same time, with the ability to easily turn pages.</p></blockquote></div><p>Pianoteq Basic will be especially for tablets and so .. The interface 32 buttons with&nbsp; choosen instruments by the user from Modartt library ready to play as they are ...</p></blockquote></div><p>Interesting, I didn&#039;t know about that.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (GRB)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 23:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944017#p944017</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: pianoteq basic: just a fxp player]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944015#p944015</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>GRB wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>SteveKK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello,</p><p>what do you think about a Pianoteq version with a very straight pipeline?</p><p>Just a fxp player with only Device preferences and velocity curves.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Personally I think the Pro version is that already.&nbsp; As I understand it, an FXP file has to be based on a certain instrument in the first place.&nbsp; I don&#039;t see where the presets get in the way of what you might want.&nbsp; I doubt there would be much value or interest in a scaled down interface.&nbsp; I think a good light weight action with top notch amplification and speakers built in is more urgent.&nbsp; Also probably a high performance tablet computer would be most desirable.&nbsp; One that could power the Pianoteq and display music pages at the same time, with the ability to easily turn pages.</p></blockquote></div><p>Pianoteq Basic will be especially for tablets and so .. The interface 32 buttons with&nbsp; choosen instruments by the user from Modartt library ready to play as they are ...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (SteveKK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944015#p944015</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: pianoteq basic: just a fxp player]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944013#p944013</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>SteveKK wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hello,</p><p>what do you think about a Pianoteq version with a very straight pipeline?</p><p>Just a fxp player with only Device preferences and velocity curves.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Personally I think the Pro version is that already.&nbsp; As I understand it, an FXP file has to be based on a certain instrument in the first place.&nbsp; I don&#039;t see where the presets get in the way of what you might want.&nbsp; I doubt there would be much value or interest in a scaled down interface.&nbsp; I think a good light weight action with top notch amplification and speakers built in is more urgent.&nbsp; Also probably a high performance tablet computer would be most desirable.&nbsp; One that could power the Pianoteq and display music pages at the same time, with the ability to easily turn pages.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (GRB)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944013#p944013</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[pianoteq basic: just a fxp player]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944009#p944009</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>what do you think about a Pianoteq version with a very straight pipeline?</p><p>Just a fxp player with only Device preferences and velocity curves.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (SteveKK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=944009#p944009</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
