<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Muse Receptor]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=411</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Muse Receptor.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:26:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Muse Receptor]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2528#p2528</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you should contact Muse Research, they do have a procedure for installing ptq files for Pianoteq. (I don&#039;t know the details of that procedure)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (julien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2528#p2528</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Muse Receptor]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2523#p2523</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in adding a Receptor when my current RAM necessitates. Right now I have PTeq on my DAW, and since it appears to eliminate several large Gigastudio libraries in one fell swoop, I might not need a Receptor.<br />Once V Rack starts selling Muse will either start converting more instruments to help stem competition and this will serve all of us better.<br />The basic 160GB versions are going for 700-1000 USD used on ebay right now, and sure look tempting.<br />From what guys I have shared a stage with that use Receptors say that the Linux O.S. can load more per GB of RAM than DAW based XP O.S.&#039;s can.<br />V Rack had better be 64bit and access more than 2GB&#039;s of RAM on the ITX motherboard it uses, or it&#039;s claims to load any VST for 2000 USD more than a used Receptor won&#039;t be that significant to justify it&#039;s expense.<br />The V Machine on the other hand is what will continue to sell, and further bring down the Receptors costs.<br />I love competition, otherwise developments have no motivation in a profit driven market.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (teamsterjim)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2523#p2523</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Muse Receptor]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2385#p2385</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have a Muse receptor and Pianteq installed on it, and it runs great.&nbsp; New piano sounds for downloading have &quot;ptq&quot; extensions.&nbsp; My receptor only knows how to deal with &quot;fxp&quot; files.&nbsp; Does anyone know if there is a way to implement &quot;ptq&quot; files or whether this is beyond the capability of a receptor pro currently.</p><p>Bill</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (wclapham)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2385#p2385</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
