<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Gigging keyboard recommendations]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=4048&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2015-10-14T17:12:31Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=4048</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Gigging keyboard recommendations]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939831#p939831"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It would help to know what requirements mikeosborne13 has for his portable keyboard. Ability to control/layer many instrument modules and effects or just Pianoteq standalone? Lightweight or just portable?</p><p>I also chose the Casio PX-150 for my portable keyboard (current model is PX-160), but I use it only to control the standalone Pianoteq software. I switch among Pianoteq instruments or presets between songs only, not in the midst of a song, so it is easy enough just to switch these on my laptop, to keep things simple. For the most part, as the pianist in jazz bands, I use a single acoustic piano preset, without switching presets or instruments. In this role, the Casio PX-150 has been fine. The pros and cons of the PX-150 have been much discussed in other threads, but for me the relevant features are its light weight (11 kg = 25 lbs), low price, and relatively good action. It initially bothered me that the keys bottom out on rubber bumpers instead of felt, but I&#039;ve adjusted to that. </p><p>Of course, I&#039;d prefer a portable keyboard more like my acoustic piano, with longer-pivot (wood?) keys and a heavier action, but currently that would mean greater weight and much greater expense.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[TimN]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4590</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-10-14T17:12:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939831#p939831</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Gigging keyboard recommendations]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939829#p939829"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>GRB wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m very pleased with my Casio PX-150 as far as playability is concerned.&nbsp; Pianoteq voice must be controlled from the computer.&nbsp; In other words, all the Casio does is provide the MIDI note data out.&nbsp; No ability select presets from the keyboard.&nbsp; Plug in a USB cable, and it just works.&nbsp; Audio reinforcement is from a separate speaker set not internal to the Casio which is a bit of a bummer as it&#039;s just more excess gear.&nbsp; I&#039;m pretty sure the PX5S has the same action as the PX-150.&nbsp; I also have a PX-130 with the same action, that I could sell.</p></blockquote></div><p>I think the PX-150 has some improvements over the PX-130 in the action, but I can&#039;t recall. A few other improvements that come to mind are the wood textured keys and the high resolution MIDI. </p><p>I am so happy with the Casio PX-350 as a controller for Pianoteq. The PX-150 would be just as good. The PX5S would be preferable if you want to utilize the keyboard&#039;s sounds and not just use it as a controller. If you want to do quick transposes via keyboard, I wouldn&#039;t recommend the PX-150. Transpose is effected via pressing a button and then a piano key. This isn&#039;t good for gigging.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[beakybird]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3938</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-10-14T15:55:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939829#p939829</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Gigging keyboard recommendations]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939827#p939827"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m very pleased with my Casio PX-150 as far as playability is concerned.&nbsp; Pianoteq voice must be controlled from the computer.&nbsp; In other words, all the Casio does is provide the MIDI note data out.&nbsp; No ability select presets from the keyboard.&nbsp; Plug in a USB cable, and it just works.&nbsp; Audio reinforcement is from a separate speaker set not internal to the Casio which is a bit of a bummer as it&#039;s just more excess gear.&nbsp; I&#039;m pretty sure the PX5S has the same action as the PX-150.&nbsp; I also have a PX-130 with the same action, that I could sell.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[GRB]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4233</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-10-14T14:38:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939827#p939827</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Gigging keyboard recommendations]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939770#p939770"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Please can I have recommendations for portable keyboards? </p><p>I am looking at Roland RD64(small keyboard - hum), SS-990 Pro, Acuna 88/73,and Numa compact? (Difficult to find any store near Portsmouth that stocks Studiologic). The Kawai VMK188 is near 30 kg.</p><p>And I see some people recommend Casio Privia PX5S.</p><p>And Kawai ES - 100.</p><p>It seems like plenty of people have asked this question previously. I had better do some more reading.</p><p>Is it possible to use controls on the keyboard to select different sounds in Pianoteq?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mikeosborne13]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4449</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-10-09T11:22:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=939770#p939770</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
