<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New comparisons of several piano libraries]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=402&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2008-09-24T12:02:24Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=402</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New comparisons of several piano libraries]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2316#p2316"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ran across this in a thread on the NorthernSounds forum. The name of each piano library\vsti is announced and then the same portion of a piece is played. It is part of an ad for Proaudio Vault&#039;s own instrument, but PianoTeq sounds very good in this comparison. (No mention is made of which preset was used.) </p><p>Notice that there are two mp3&#039;s, one for pp playing and one for forte playing:</p><p><a href="http://www.proaudiovault.com/bdmo-comparison.htm">http://www.proaudiovault.com/bdmo-comparison.htm</a></p><p>A midi file was used to render the recordings, but in this case, that doesn&#039;t seem to be as much of a problem as on some previous comparisons.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-09-24T12:02:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2316#p2316</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
