<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3956&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2015-07-14T10:49:55Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=3956</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938821#p938821"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Hell, even actual pianos have more latency than that because of their mechanics!</p></blockquote></div><p> Lol, true.</p><p>...but I still kind of suspicious if that Pianoteq sample rate version limitation somehow influence the normal behaviour of latency decrease for sample rate above 48 kHz also?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AKM]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4253</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T10:49:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938821#p938821</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938820#p938820"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think anything &lt;5 ms latency reported by the driver is perfectly fine for playing the piano. That will result in &lt;12 or so ms round-trip latency, which is absolutely undetectable by human ear. Hell, even actual pianos have more latency than that because of their mechanics!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T10:47:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938820#p938820</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938819#p938819"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I tested it all some time ago and I got no major problems running any sample rates with 64 samples latency (which is the lowest for the most sound cards, though there are a few card models around that are capable to run at 32 samples buffer size). I sure could not feel the noticeable latency difference while playing the keyboard during that short tests, but maybe I&#039;ll be able to feel some difference kind of subconsciously if I&#039;ll give it a more extensive try.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AKM]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4253</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T10:46:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938819#p938819</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938818#p938818"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that Frequency and Buffer size work as a &quot;block&quot;.</p><p>It seems that there is a level of latency that can&#039;t go lower (for a specific soundcard and pc).</p><p>You can try to increase the frequency but in my experience, you will need to increase the buffer too.<br />All in all, you will increase the cpu charge for no significant improvement in the sound, IMO</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[stamkorg]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3941</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T10:36:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938818#p938818</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938817#p938817"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>But I think I can try to run it at 96000 Hz / 64 samples buffer size ;)</p><p>AND btw somebody may want to check this site for the audio cards latency comparison tables: <a href="http://dawbench.com/audio-int-lowlatency2.htm">http://dawbench.com/audio-int-lowlatency2.htm</a> And if someone is lazy to read the whole article here is a site with the free audio card latency test software <a href="http://www.oblique-audio.com/free/rtlutility">http://www.oblique-audio.com/free/rtlutility</a> (note that you need to connect the audio input and output of your card directly with a single wire for this test, all the rest is done almost in one click).</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AKM]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4253</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T10:16:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938817#p938817</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938813#p938813"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Of course you do, that&#039;s how changing the sample rate works.</p><p>Then again, it&#039;s arguably better to just use 44.1k at lower buffer size (like 128 or 64) than to work at 96k. Perhaps it&#039;s even a bit more efficient on the CPU too.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T08:32:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938813#p938813</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Latency boost by running at 96000 Hz?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938812#p938812"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>I&#039;ve got the Pianoteq Stage version and so my question is am I getting the latency decrease by setting it to 96000 Hz in the audio preferences? I&#039;m aware that the audio engine is not capable to do 96000 Hz due to the version limitations, so there will be some processor power waste, but what about the latency?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[AKM]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4253</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-07-14T08:19:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=938812#p938812</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
