<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3859&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2022-04-14T13:35:14Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=3859</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981457#p981457"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating clip. Gould had the worst posture of any professional classical pianist I&#039;ve ever seen, goodness knows how he managed to play. Yes, I&#039;d be interested in emulating the &#039;old time&#039; piano sound, I&#039;d describe the sound on this clip as mellow and characterful rather than rough.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-14T13:35:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981457#p981457</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981455#p981455"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well, since this thread was unburried, I will question real Steinway &amp; Sons old piano sounds.</p><p>Take this 1959 film about Glenn Gould trying to find a piano he likes, and a chair.</p><p>Everything it&#039;s so rough... They took clients to a basement or sort of thing, quite ugly room, and the pianos sounds heavy, rough, a bit like a fortepiano from 1800&#039;s something... The salesman appears a mix of a comedian with used car seller.</p><p><a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=15BAagfdZ8c&amp;t=48s">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=15BAagfdZ8c&amp;t=48s</a></p><p>It&#039;s not just the pianos tunned to live performance of recordings that was rough in sound. In other video even Glen&#039;s piano sounds rough. Not bad I must make if clear, but rough/heavy compared to a modern Steinway. Also today they got an ultra clean polishec look, from the wood to the keyboard and harp, like it was in a jewelry.</p><p>I wonder if would be a good idea if pianoteq could have a option from the good old days era, with a tunning &amp; voicing to emulate this old days sound style.</p><p>Anyway Gould&#039;s request could be directed to Ellon Musk, to create a piano that goes by itself.<br />Just to see Glenn laughing loud of a joke made this video worth to watch :-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-14T12:33:25Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981455#p981455</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981430#p981430"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Great, thanks for that! First impressions of PianoVerb, interesting and very encouraging. With careful adjustment I think it will be quite a nice enhancement. I have a feeling it will probably work best on &#039;close&#039; piano sounds, but those are the ones I feel most need some extra resonance anyway. Quite happy to work with the freebie for now, may be tempted to go for the full version eventually.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-13T16:37:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981430#p981430</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981428#p981428"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes, I have known about PianoVerb for some time but never got around to trying it. It might just be that special &#039;something&#039; I&#039;m looking for. Just discovered that the basic version is free, so now I have no excuse! <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>Been playing with Pianoteq and PianoVerb just now. It helps with chord resonances too. Enjoy the freebie version. It&#039;s very good. I had the freebie for sometime before I bought the paid version and the freebie is very, very good. Just not as adjustable as the paid one. But to be honest I don&#039;t adjust the paid one. I just use default setting and dial down the modulation wheel to zero as I don&#039;t want a wah wah piano.</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-13T15:57:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981428#p981428</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981425#p981425"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have known about PianoVerb for some time but never got around to trying it. It might just be that special &#039;something&#039; I&#039;m looking for. Just discovered that the basic version is free, so now I have no excuse! <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-13T14:33:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981425#p981425</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981424#p981424"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just a suggestion. I have used PSP&#039;s PianoVerb with Pianoteq. Some interesting results. Maybe have a go. Certainly increases the resonance and adds something.</p><p>Warmest regards,</p><p>Chris</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[sigasa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=399</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-13T14:17:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981424#p981424</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981401#p981401"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p><p>Now I have made the changes Philippe suggests, on my demo song with K2, as I did a week ago. I think I got more warmth and softness in the music, regardless of which chords I use.<br />For those who are new to the forum, we must remember that K2&nbsp; &nbsp;&quot;is not based on any specific model but created from scratch by the Modartt virtual piano factory, combining the best elements of several source pianos&quot;. </p><p>As a new piano not modelled from a Grand piano, I think it has brilliance and clarity and I can use it as an all-round instrument. Have now tested rag time, Bach and my own small compositions and got used to this sound. An excellent instrument to complement the other Pianoteq sounds. Using always headphones, neighbors you know.</p><p> Well, that’s what I think about it. Have been on board since 2013 and rediscovered the piano! Nice <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Best wishes</p><p>Stig</p><p>Pianoteqenthusiast, Organteqenthusiast, Harpteqenthusiast, Harpsichordteqenthusiast</p><p><a href="https://forum.modartt.com/uploads.php?file=K2%20.mp3">https://forum.modartt.com/uploads.php?file=K2%20.mp3</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Pianoteqenthusiast]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3755</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-12T20:35:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981401#p981401</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981393#p981393"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ah, hadn&#039;t even noticed the date of the OP. However, the issue with resonance still applies as far as I&#039;m concerned. I&#039;m not saying that Pianoteq&#039;s sound isn&#039;t good - far from it - but I think some more warmth and resonance for the basic sounds would really propel it into the stratosphere.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-12T15:23:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981393#p981393</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981387#p981387"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dazric wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Yes, I know what you&#039;re getting at, Ross.</p></blockquote></div><p>Ross wrote than seven years ago! <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Key Fumbler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6154</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-12T13:57:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981387#p981387</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981380#p981380"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know what you&#039;re getting at, Ross. Recently I&#039;ve been trying to record (on Pianoteq) some very simple piano music with no pedal, and I&#039;ve found it quite challenging to make it come across well. The trouble is, many of the pianos have very little resonance when you play single notes without pedal. However. there is one piano which has some gloriously modelled resonance, and that&#039;s the NY Steinway Square (1858). I&#039;d love to hear some of that sort of resonance on the modern pianos. On my modest acoustic upright, the whole thing &#039;comes alive&#039; when you play a single note without the pedal, and it resonates for several seconds afterwards.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dazric]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5077</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-12T09:46:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981380#p981380</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981377#p981377"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I have the exact same &quot;issue&quot; and I&#039;m kind of glad that it&#039;s not just me!</p><p>So after all these years, it is still the same and that leads me to believe that it&#039;s just the way it is as far as modeling goes. Right?</p><p>By the way, I got the Stage version so I can&#039;t change those parameters mentioned in other replies.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[meghdad]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=7813</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2022-04-12T07:31:08Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=981377#p981377</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937977#p937977"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Another suggestion I&#039;m thinking about after reading your &quot;more full and rich sound&quot;: try increasing the Sympathetic resonance (in the Design panel), it will increase the natural resonance of all strings and give you a fuller sound when the sustain pedal is depressed.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-22T06:34:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937977#p937977</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937975#p937975"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Mossy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>You gotta record your ideal acoustic piano playing those same chords to really have any type of comparison.</p></blockquote></div><p>I have no acoustic grand, but Steve Kk made a great <a href="http://goo.gl/hbnpKn">comparison</a>. Listen for example, at 0:41-0:54, 1:18-1:34. It&#039;s more noticeble in chords, especially in lower range: acoustic grand produce more full and rich sound, more brilliant (but not in such way as after increasing hammer hardness). Pianoteq, in contrast produce more... hmm... &quot;flat&quot; sound. It&#039;s like &quot;limited&quot; by something. It&#039;s not depend on pianoteq&#039;s model.</p><p>Philippe, yes, if I make piano not so perfect (random detuning, radnom volume, condition), then it makes chords not so flat, but it&#039;s still mainly sounds &quot;pianotequish&quot;.</p><p>Maybe randomizing anther parameters (hammer hardness, unison width, etc.) stoves the problem, but I haven&#039;t Pro version to check it.</p><p>It&#039;s all my IMHO. Maybe I have wrong ear. Sorry for that.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ross]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=4064</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-21T20:33:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937975#p937975</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937953#p937953"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ross, here are a few suggestions you could try for increasing the feeling of &quot;richness&quot; of chords:<br /></p><ul><li><p>push slightly to the right the condition slider. That makes the sound less &quot;perfect&quot;, as if the piano was not very freshly tuned (all Pianoteq version),</p></li><li><p>detune slightly a few notes to obtain beatings in fifths, fourths and octaves that are a bit faster than usual. See &quot;Detune notes&quot; in the Diapason menu (Standard and PRO versions),</p></li><li><p>increase slightly the unison width, to have beatings on single notes.</p></li></ul>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-21T12:23:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937953#p937953</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Unrealistic pianoteq chords]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937950#p937950"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think he meant &quot;rich&quot;, not &quot;reach&quot;.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2015-04-21T07:02:24Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=937950#p937950</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
