<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=362</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Question about the PTQ EQ.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2139#p2139</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for the help!<br />Now I use the EQ+the overtone sliders and get all I ever wanted! Really funny how knowledge&nbsp; blocks creativity and sometimes turnes out not to be knowledge at all.<br />I never found a discription on the pianoteq site-don&#039;t know why. Where is it to download?</p><p>greetings</p><p>azrael4</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (azrael4)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2139#p2139</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2133#p2133</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>you know you can always count on my suggestions to give you more programming work :-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Luc Henrion)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2133#p2133</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2119#p2119</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was expecting this suggestion <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i> Actually, we have in mind an alternative that will solve the problem, but it&#039;s a bit early to give details...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Philippe Guillaume)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2119#p2119</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2118#p2118</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guillaume, could you maybe give the user the option to choose between both mode instead?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Luc Henrion)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2118#p2118</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2117#p2117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, you are absolutely right. As a matter of fact, when implementing this EQ, we thought it was interesting that it changes the timbre of each note without changing its relative loudness - the interest being that you can boost the low frequencies while still maintaining the overall equilibrium between bass range and trebble. This was possible to implement because the EQ acts on each note before it is computed, unlike a standard EQ which acts on the global audio flux (all notes mixed together). But this unusual way of working seems to be quite confusing, so for the next version, we plan to remove the normalization step, thus boosting low frequencies will both boost low frequencies of each note and rise the loudness of the bass notes.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Philippe Guillaume)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2117#p2117</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2116#p2116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>The EQ is not a regular EQ. A regular EQ effect is a post process filter. PTQ&#039;s EQ is pre-process working directly on the model. Lesson 4 in the manual will give you a better idea ...</p><p>-- Eran</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (etalmor)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2116#p2116</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2115#p2115</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heinke</p><p>What I have found is that the EQ uses a relative curve instead of an absolute curve...<br />this means that if you slide the total curve up, the overall sound will not change whereas you would expect all frequencies to be boosted....</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (creart)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2115#p2115</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Question about the PTQ EQ]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2114#p2114</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Everyone!<br />Playing around with all the PTQ sliders for a long time now, I never used the PTQ EQ very often. The EQ for me allways reacted so different from any other EQ I&#039;ve used before. So is it an EQ in a usual way? For me it sounds more like a PTQ allgorithm-dependent parameter that influences the frequency values of the PTQ sound. It changes the sound more than, in my opinion an EQ could do. So please tell me if I&#039;m right or wrong! (What ever I hear:&quot;it drives&nbsp; me crazy!&quot;)&nbsp; I&#039;ve to say that it is in deed very effective, but I do things with it I would&#039;t do with other EQ&#039;s. <br />please help me PTQ-team!</p><p>greetings <br />heinke</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (azrael4)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2114#p2114</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
