<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=341&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2008-07-21T14:29:14Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=341</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2002#p2002"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>There&#039;s a free working demo version of PianoTeq that has a few crippled notes. If you download this demo version from the PianoTeq site and experiment with it, could you let us know how it works out for you?</p></blockquote></div><p>I have DL&#039;ed the demo version and will test it this week.&nbsp; I&#039;ll let you know how it works out.</p><p>I am also looking into the Muse Research Receptor as used by Hugh Sung.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[KennyDeVries]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=655</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-21T14:29:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=2002#p2002</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1987#p1987"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>KennyDeVries wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Are there any plans to issue a TDM version of the product?&nbsp; I don&#039;t particularly like RTAS.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hi Ken, there are no plans for a TDM version. For best performance of the RTAS version, just make sure the hardware buffer size is set to at least 64 samples.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-19T18:04:53Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1987#p1987</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1986#p1986"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s a free working demo version of PianoTeq that has a few crippled notes. If you download this demo version from the PianoTeq site and experiment with it, could you let us know how it works out for you?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jake Johnson]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=11</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-19T17:53:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1986#p1986</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1985#p1985"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I know this is not what you wanted to hear, but you know, it really would be much better to run Pianoteq on a separate computer than your Pro Tools system and control it via MIDI.&nbsp; You could also run other software instruments on that computer.&nbsp; Yep.. more money, but you&#039;ve probably been meaning to ride your bicycle more, anyway....</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Cellomangler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=495</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-19T17:45:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1985#p1985</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1984#p1984"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t there some VST-&gt;RTAS plugin wrapper for protools? If there is, try using that.</p><p>Well, depending on your cpu, it&#039;s moderately intensive. If you have quad-core, I think you&#039;ll not notice much cpu-leeching from pianoteq. If you use a lot of bass notes under sustain pedal, the cpu use increases by a large margin, so take heed of that. But generally, on my Core2Duo @2.2 GHz, most of the time I have around 5-20% cpu usage, worst case (over 128 sustained notes) being something around 35%</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-19T16:07:07Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1984#p1984</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Interested in PianoTeq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1973#p1973"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p><p>I am not a keyboardist.&nbsp; &nbsp;I am a guitar player and a studio owner.</p><p>I have Protools 7.3.1 and have tried various sampled piano programs including NI Acoustik Piano.</p><p>I have had difficulty getting the NI stuff to work correctly - very buggy as an RTAS plugin in PT - all kinds of latency and tracking issues.</p><p>I am possibly looking to replace the NI stuff with PianoTeq.</p><p>I just read the review on ProRec.com, a site I frequent quite a bit and trust when it comes to recording technology.</p><p>I would like to hear from those using PianoTeq in PT as an instrument track plug-in.</p><p>Are there any plans to issue a TDM version of the product?&nbsp; I don&#039;t particularly like RTAS.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Ken</p><p>PS.&nbsp; How CPU intensive is it?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[KennyDeVries]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=655</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-07-18T05:04:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1973#p1973</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
