<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Tuning out the longitudinal mode in the D4]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=3174&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2014-02-06T03:18:42Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=3174</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Tuning out the longitudinal mode in the D4]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=930438#p930438"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve always wondered why, when increasing the string length to its maximum, the lower bass region sounds equal parts sonorous and annoying. After viewing <a href="http://www.speech.kth.se/music/5_lectures/conklin/longitudinal.html">this</a> link, I may have found out why. Even at maximum string length, the L-mode interferes with the perfect consonace between octaves in a significant way. So, with just a trial version of Pianoteq, I tried altering the cutoff frequency and the Q-factor, however, when the offending partials are reduced to a point of tolerability, the decay in the lower region becomes way too damped, even at maximum impedance. Have any of you tried filtering out the partials related to the L-mode? I would like to hear your thoughts on this.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[lowendtheory]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3379</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-02-06T03:18:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=930438#p930438</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
