<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Competition]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=3112</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Competition.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:52:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929646#p929646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>At the very first I tried this was very impressed, but using it more than 10&#039; it was a sobering experience: there were much rough and harsh overtones, resonance effects, I couldn&#039;t really get rid of by setting. </p><p>I tried it two times, some 1,5 years between the tries and the second time I couldn&#039;t notice much difference.</p><p>During the same time Pianoteq evolved a lot, after v4 with the Bluethner came the new v4.5 engine with the Upright at they brought real refinements. If this pace will be retained,&nbsp; very soon we shall have the situation that nothing surpasses PTQ. </p><p>Maybe this Chinese product (and I say it with sympathy for his developer) will also evolve to this high level with potential as PTQ at some time in future, but it is still a newcomer.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Temperament)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929646#p929646</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929613#p929613</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have loved for a long time, and supported pianoteq.</p><p>At next version, I expect beautiful tone color that surpass sampling sound source.</p><p>&quot;From eternal fan of your company!!&quot;</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sskuk1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929613#p929613</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929612#p929612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>weak sound, timbre bad compared to the various Ivory or true pianos, playability far from that of PT .... poor product, in my opinion</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (paolopiano)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929612#p929612</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929609#p929609</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s geting there step by step.<br />Who kwen pianoteq since the early versions knows how much it improved.</p><p>I supose Modartt could try a hybrid approuch, like allow just some fraction of the sound to be sampled, like the fraction that carries warmness, sort as they did with hammer noises.</p><br /><p>But this could make things too easy and defocus the atention from the perfectionist challenge of get full naturality by just modeling.<br />They need some challenge intusiasm to keep searching and perfecting modelling. </p><br /><div class="quotebox"><cite>sskuk1 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m prefer more pianoteq.</p><p>However, It is another feeling when compare with pianoteq. <br />Sound of this VSTI is actual, warm, and natural.<br />Want that pianoteq develops much more in this side.&nbsp; <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929609#p929609</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929608#p929608</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Soundmagic ? It&#039;s a joke no ? <i class="far fa-meh-rolling-eyes smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lylo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 12:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929608#p929608</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929607#p929607</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sampling seems good.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (custral)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929607#p929607</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929606#p929606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>(re: the 2 above posts) ...uh.....wut??</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2013 00:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929606#p929606</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929605#p929605</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well... sampling seems good, development isn&#039;t, seems homebrew and gets in the sampling&#039;s way. Help essentially absent.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (custral)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929605#p929605</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929582#p929582</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m prefer more pianoteq.</p><p>However, It is another feeling when compare with pianoteq. <br />Sound of this VSTI is actual, warm, and natural.<br />Want that pianoteq develops much more in this side.&nbsp; <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (sskuk1)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929582#p929582</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929580#p929580</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Went and sprung for the Bosendorfer. Strictly as a curio, my persuasion is modeling. Hafta wait, for some human to get up and push the buttons. 12 hours, they say.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (custral)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929580#p929580</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929579#p929579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nope, it is not better than Pianoteq. Tried it, wasn&#039;t thrilled.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929579#p929579</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Competition]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929577#p929577</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.supremepiano.com/product/sp.htm">http://www.supremepiano.com/product/sp.htm</a></p><p>Is it better than PT? Or worse?</p><p>Anyway, I am on the brink of jumping ship towards sampled pianos. There is just some dullness in the PT sound compared to samples. I know this has been discussed (fought) over a dozen times already, I don&#039;t really wanna start a new discussion. Just sayin.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (User123123123)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 19:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=929577#p929577</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
