<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=3036</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Idea for the future of Pianoteq.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 02:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928874#p928874</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would like a option to slow down a MP3 or wave audio file, but without change the pitch.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 02:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928874#p928874</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928870#p928870</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think some aspects of this may have been discussed by someone else in another thread: I have been trying to use Pianoteq to learn new pieces from MIDI files and, while some of the features like variable rate playback are very helpful, a couple of additional tweaks would be huge helps --</p><p>(1) A higher-contrast display of which keys are being pressed/played by the file (perhaps showing the active keys as some color), or at least the option of some sort of &quot;red key&quot; display.&nbsp; One piece that I&#039;m currently working on uses a lot of the black keys -- often simultaneously -- and it&#039;s nearly impossible to figure out which keys are being pressed before the file steps ahead to the next notes.</p><p>(2) When replaying a MIDI file, would it be possible to continue to display which keys are being played when I hit the Pause (ll) button?&nbsp; Right now, when I hit pause it clears the keyboard display.</p><p>Thanks, and keep up the fantastic work!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (duggadugdug)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928870#p928870</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928763#p928763</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I really &amp; honestly do not want to start an OS war on this (I use Windows, have to, for my work-related stuff), but a couple of years ago I was dreaming the same dreams on unobtrusive, quiet, stable and performant music system, and I ended up buying a mac mini (2009 model I think). Running pianoteq and NI komplete on it without any issues whatsoever for all these years. Do not even know whether it is fanless, do not even know the basics of OSX either. Can leave it on for months without a reboot if desired.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (pz)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928763#p928763</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928760#p928760</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p> Pianoteq can be run on Atom, but I&#039;m not sure it allows for full 256 notes polyphony.</p></blockquote></div><p>I tried it on my Atom (1.66GHz N450) based netbook some time ago and whilst it was usable, it indeed did not reach 256 voices - I got about 24 voices.&nbsp; 24 might seem very low, but it still sounded good.</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (skip)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928760#p928760</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928758#p928758</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bebop603 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen fanless i5 systems, but they probably run pretty hot</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;m using a fanless i7. Quite a performance; only running warm, not hot.</p><p><a href="http://www.minipc.eu/passive-ivy-v3-configureren">http://www.minipc.eu/passive-ivy-v3-configureren</a></p><p>is in dutch though.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (HermanVanAartsen)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928758#p928758</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928756#p928756</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Still, give it a couple of years and comparable systems probably will.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (xinaes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928756#p928756</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928755#p928755</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, RPi has absolutely no horsepower for Pianoteq...</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928755#p928755</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928750#p928750</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.origenae.com/en/htpc_x15e.htm">http://www.origenae.com/en/htpc_x15e.htm</a></p><br /><br /><p>+</p><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.sticker-forever.com/stickers-au-metre/sticker-vinyle-autocollant-immitation-bois-7-au-metre.html">http://www.sticker-forever.com/stickers...metre.html</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Lylo)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928750#p928750</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928735#p928735</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought re-implementing some core basic DSP algorithms to work on a different architecture would be a relatively minor task (not the same as recoding everything from scratch), although getting it to the point where the new implementations were comparably well optimised may be much trickier. A classic example of the kind of thing where I imagine 90% of the work would be fairly easy but there&#039;d be some devils in the details going from a mostly-working prototype to polished product.</p><p>I&#039;ve daydreamed about transplanting my RaspberryPi into my piano to do a more energy efficient job of the MIDI side (the piano burns about 47watts I think for no good reason), but I don&#039;t think it RPi has the requisite horsepower for Pianoteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (xinaes)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928735#p928735</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928503#p928503</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think i3 should be perfectly fine. Still more powerful than Atom. Pianoteq can be run on Atom, but I&#039;m not sure it allows for full 256 notes polyphony.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928503#p928503</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928500#p928500</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>bebop603 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>(Multi-core ARM chips are starting to get powerful enough?)</p></blockquote></div><p>Pianoteq doesn&#039;t work on ARM chips, I think (because of SSE2/AVX extensions Pianoteq is most likely already using to squeeze out more computational juice from the CPU), it would need to be recoded from scratch. You need an Intel or AMD (preferably Intel) CPU to get the most out of Pianoteq.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hmm...partly written in assembly..interesting.&nbsp; I guess there are plenty of options for a fanless intel/AMD chip or multi-core Atom (which I think Pianoteq can run on).&nbsp; I&#039;ve seen fanless i5 systems, but they probably run pretty hot:</p><p><a href="http://www.silentpcreview.com/aleutia-h3r">http://www.silentpcreview.com/aleutia-h3r</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bebop603)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928500#p928500</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928450#p928450</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>bebop603 wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>(Multi-core ARM chips are starting to get powerful enough?)</p></blockquote></div><p>Pianoteq doesn&#039;t work on ARM chips, I think (because of SSE2/AVX extensions Pianoteq is most likely already using to squeeze out more computational juice from the CPU), it would need to be recoded from scratch. You need an Intel or AMD (preferably Intel) CPU to get the most out of Pianoteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928450#p928450</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928448#p928448</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>paolopiano wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>yes .... and a real grand piano action inside .....</p></blockquote></div><p>My wish list would be:</p><p>Fanless CPU (Multi-core ARM chips are starting to get powerful enough?)<br />Minimalist LCD (that just shows preset instrument) and knobs<br />Interface to the Full Pianoteq Interface through Remote Laptop connection (ie through ethernet/wifi like Muse Receptor)<br />Wood top (CNC&#039;d out of ash etc)&nbsp; and aluminum bottom that can also serve as a heatsink<br />High Quality audio chipset and powerful Headphone amp to power 300/600 ohm headphones<br />Wooden keys (like the wooden Fatar action if necessary)</p><p>&lt;= 27 kg if possible</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (bebop603)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928448#p928448</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928354#p928354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There are quite a few computer on a circuit board arrangements these days like arduino or rasberrypi that run linux and potentially pianoteq provided the CPU is powerful enough and is an archetectural supported by pianoteq.&nbsp; &nbsp;Then you&#039;d just need to provlde the I/O connections midi and audio.&nbsp; Nice project for someone with the right computer and electronics skills.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (varpa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928354#p928354</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Idea for the future of Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928350#p928350</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yes .... and a real grand piano action inside .....</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (paolopiano)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=928350#p928350</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
