<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2885&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2013-06-05T14:49:19Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2885</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926637#p926637"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Remamber to do proper adjusts things.</p><p>Pianoteq 4.5 have lower volume, and if you adjust velocity curves instead of volume, you will alter the performance basis.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-06-05T14:49:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926637#p926637</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926635#p926635"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>cslevine wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>well, i have the same feeling with the new resonance method of v4.5.1, in the D4 :</p><p>before, with v4.2.1 the sound was bright even when all other orchestra was playing !<br />Now, with v4.5, the sound sounds like &quot;damped ? &quot;, under the other, like if some note was near &quot;missing&quot;... (not a license bug, lol checked ok by soloing the tracks. )</p><p>and it sounds again more like the &quot;wawa&quot; effect style of Pianoteq 3.6 resonance<br />( not &quot;wawa&quot;, more &quot;flanger&quot; ), when the Pianoteq v4.2 sounded clear and spacy.</p><br /><p>So that</p></blockquote></div><p>Do you use any plug in reverb at all? I am going to try the plug in program as on the video. May be that will give a better sound. Anyone can recommend a good reverb plug in? Thanks DP</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dai phan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3564</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-06-05T13:09:58Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926635#p926635</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926634#p926634"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>well, i have the same feeling with the new resonance method of v4.5.1, in the D4 :</p><p>before, with v4.2.1 the sound was bright even when all other orchestra was playing !<br />Now, with v4.5, the sound sounds like &quot;damped ? &quot;, under the other, like if some note was near &quot;missing&quot;... (not a license bug, lol checked ok by soloing the tracks. )</p><p>and it sounds again more like the &quot;wawa&quot; effect style of Pianoteq 3.6 resonance<br />( not &quot;wawa&quot;, more &quot;flanger&quot; ), when the Pianoteq v4.2 sounded clear and spacy.</p><br /><p>So that</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[cslevine]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=48</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-06-05T12:36:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926634#p926634</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926633#p926633"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,</p><p>I came across this and this PT sounds really good. DP</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yClnfiVgAs">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yClnfiVgAs</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dai phan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3564</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-06-05T12:13:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926633#p926633</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926632#p926632"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Klemperer wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Do you own the YC5 (Yamaha) addon? For my taste pianoteq doesn&#039;t sound too soft, but for a piano that should cut through orchestration I&#039;d play with that one and then find out what I like and adjust the ?? you would prefer for your piece. I also use the very old Bechstein (introduced in version 2 of pianoteq if I remember right, but adjusted for v3) and toy with that, and then try to create that &quot;crispyness&quot; of that sound to another modern grand like Bluethner or D4 or whatever you prefer. Just an idea, that&#039;s how I try to achieve things <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>. <br />If you for whatever reason are not satisfied - some use layered sounds (I don&#039;t, I am happy with pianoteq). So you could try doubling your piano tracks, creating more layers. One with pianoteq and another with a sampled piano you might own. What I sometimes do is - giving a piano track to 2 different pianoteq-instruments, thus not needing the samples that grow virtual dust on my external hard drive <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>.<br />All the best!</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello,</p><p>I have the Kawai VPC1 and I set to the PT curve. The piano sound seems muffled still even after I play around with all the settings. I think I need to get a processor plug in to get the sound right. I do have quality HS-80/HS-10 speakers so anyone can recommend a good plug in to get the maximum out of the PT? BTW, I bought all the pianos available. Thanks DP</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dai phan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3564</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-06-05T12:06:36Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926632#p926632</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926600#p926600"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Do you own the YC5 (Yamaha) addon? For my taste pianoteq doesn&#039;t sound too soft, but for a piano that should cut through orchestration I&#039;d play with that one and then find out what I like and adjust the ?? you would prefer for your piece. I also use the very old Bechstein (introduced in version 2 of pianoteq if I remember right, but adjusted for v3) and toy with that, and then try to create that &quot;crispyness&quot; of that sound to another modern grand like Bluethner or D4 or whatever you prefer. Just an idea, that&#039;s how I try to achieve things <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>. <br />If you for whatever reason are not satisfied - some use layered sounds (I don&#039;t, I am happy with pianoteq). So you could try doubling your piano tracks, creating more layers. One with pianoteq and another with a sampled piano you might own. What I sometimes do is - giving a piano track to 2 different pianoteq-instruments, thus not needing the samples that grow virtual dust on my external hard drive <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>.<br />All the best!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Klemperer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=590</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-31T08:02:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926600#p926600</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926599#p926599"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Did you calibrate the velocity response to your keyboard yet?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ben Crosland]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3146</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-30T22:31:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926599#p926599</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926587#p926587"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Of course you can try the different Pianoteq models (D4, Bluether, etc) and see if that makes a difference.&nbsp; &nbsp;Otherwise you could try reducing the dynamic range (with slider below volume slider) or adding compression (effects: COMP).&nbsp; Possibly the equalizer could help - boost the higher frequencies to make the piano brighter.&nbsp; Also you could lower the volume of the orchestration.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[varpa]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1918</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-29T02:55:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926587#p926587</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pianoteq observation.]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926584#p926584"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p><p>I have the 4.5.1 standard version and I also downloaded all the available pianos. I notice that the piano sounds tends to be &quot;soft&quot; and not clear even through quality headphones. My music is piano with orchestration and I need the piano to cut through the mix. Is there a plug in that renders the piano to be brighter? I have spent many hours adjusting the mic and hammer levels but it still too soft for my taste. Thank you all for your help on this forum. DP</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dai phan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3564</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-29T01:18:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926584#p926584</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
