<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2866</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in request for Pianoteq enhancement.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926490#p926490</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a concrete problem I recently encountered, and there were others: Pianoteq Bechstein has a harpsichord-like sound that naturally suggests baroque music. This led me to baroque tuning (A = 415 Hz). With this tuning the G1 note has a huge &quot;wolf&quot; (don&#039;t know why and don&#039;t really care to know); it is curable with Spectrum Profile in Note Edit, but I found that the difference between the &quot;wolf&quot; and a nice sharp tone was somewhere within that 1 db which I could not penetrate due to the lack of resolution; it is either a &quot;wolf&quot; or a tad too bland.</p><p>Speaking generally, 0.5 db difference in level of whatever is considered (by sound engineers) to be about the limit of what can be plainly heard by anyone; finer differences are also heard, of course, but require attentive listening and decent equipment (also ears vary). This means that someone with a reasonably good stereo system listening to a Pianoteq recording can very well hear/feel the lack of precision inherent in 1 db resolution; certainly I do. Ask any, say, mixing engineer if he would agree to use a console that does not allow less than 1 db adjustments; chances are he&#039;ll just laugh at this preposterous suggestion. Adjusting spectrum is quite analogous to mixing. 0.1 db increment is not very necessary by itself, I agree, but it allows 0.3 db or 0.7 db or whatever; and, occasionally, I actually have used 0.1 db increment (in my DAW).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (alexkrig)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926490#p926490</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926489#p926489</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I must say I never felt that 0.1 or even 0.5 dB was important while I was tweaking sounds in Pianoteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926489#p926489</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926488#p926488</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No, I am not at all referring to MIDI control; I am referring to editing sound parameters that go to make a preset. Here is the list of all the places where finer db resolution (ideally 0.1 db) would be good, it is not long:</p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Voicing<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; spectrum profile level of different harmonics</p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Sound Recording<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; level of microphones</p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp;Volume</p><p>It is important that the finer resolution of Spectrum Profile and Volume be available in Note Edit as well as globally.</p><p>I do not use the Pianoteq Equalizer or the effects, but for people who do, 0.1 db resolution is probably desirable.</p><p>There are other db parameters (noises, for example), but it does not seem to me that finer resolution is necessary there.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (alexkrig)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926488#p926488</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926487#p926487</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Can you be more explicit in your request - &quot;db&quot; is a measure of volume and most parameters do not directly control volume.&nbsp; Since parameters can be assigned to midi controllers I would assume that the range of values is limited to 0..127.&nbsp; Perhaps this is what you are referring to.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (varpa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926487#p926487</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[request for Pianoteq enhancement]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926477#p926477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In various places in Pianoteq, parameter resolution is 1 db; I have found myself needing 0.5 db or even a finer increment, perhaps. Half a db difference is clearly heard on any reasonably good equipment; it would be very nice if Pianoteq&#039;s resolution was at least this fine, 0.1 db would be even better (de facto standard for professional audio software).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (alexkrig)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926477#p926477</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
