<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2835&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2013-05-08T17:23:31Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2835</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926416#p926416"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Pianoteq do not need much RAM, even for hungry piano add-ons.</p></blockquote></div><p>That&#039;s very true. But I couldn&#039;t resist to write the &quot;tons&quot; joke. <br />And indeed, like already stated here, U4 doesn&#039;t use twice as many resources, just &quot;more&quot;. Works still very fine here, so I&#039;m all happy.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Klemperer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=590</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-08T17:23:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926416#p926416</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926406#p926406"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Pianoteq do not need much RAM, even for hungry piano add-ons.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-08T13:17:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926406#p926406</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926400#p926400"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>...</p><p>Today most people use computers with more power than required for pianoteq.</p></blockquote></div><p>No, not all, yet surely many. To make all happy and make sure users who don&#039;t buy a new machine every 2-3 years (which, for 80% of all people would in fact be nonsense, yet nearly all do, and yes, I am aware some really need always the newest machine) would buy our great piano also - quite a lot of software, like NI massive or IK Multimedia amplitube and more, have exactly what you say - kind of &quot;eco&quot; and &quot;normal&quot; and &quot;ultra&quot; configurations. So people with newest machines plus 800 tons of RAM^^ could use the ultra settings, while others might prefer less heavy ones, using the best only for the finished song, maybe.</p><p>If, in the future, the new superb models would use more cpu, a little hint at the purchase section would be met with a warm welcome <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i><br />Just don&#039;t forget there are people in the world who have to ask themselves a) a better machine? and b) ....or more superb software but still using the 6 year old dual core. That&#039;s reality for some of us.<br />But your idea is great, Beto-music. Options for hungry versions, why not?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Klemperer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=590</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-05-07T14:07:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926400#p926400</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926238#p926238"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>He can be small (upright) but have a huge stomach.</p><br /><p>I supose all models could have options for &quot;hungry&quot; versions.&nbsp; if the sound can get better with more CPU power required (to computate more piano sound details) many people would be dispose to try.</p><p>Today most people use computers with more power than required for pianoteq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-20T22:41:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926238#p926238</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926182#p926182"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>P4 is single-core and Pianoteq utilizes multiple cores really well, so if you have only one core, you&#039;re in deep.</p><br /><p>Advice, forget about ye olde P4. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-15T14:22:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926182#p926182</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926174#p926174"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the confirmation Julien. About the actual increase percentage; I guess it depends on the CPU type. I&#039;ve installed Pianoteq on 3 different PC configurations (old P4, E6300, Atom Dual Core) and on the P4 it&#039;s almost 2x more CPU. I haven&#039;t tested the U4 on my other PCs yet. BTW, I&#039;m not complaining at all about this increase in CPU if it is required to get the proper sound, I was just wondering if what I was experiencing was normal. Thanks for the clarification.</p><p>Chuck</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chucky5p]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-15T08:49:31Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926174#p926174</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926173#p926173"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is expected, the specific model used for the U4 is a bit more heavy on the cpu, it is not 2x more, but it is definitively more.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-15T08:18:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926173#p926173</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[U4 uses almost 2x more CPU?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926172#p926172"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I bought the new U4 add-on and I&#039;m very happy to finally get an upright piano from Modartt. However, I&#039;ve noticed that compared to the D4, Bluethner and most other Modartt pianos, the U4 uses almost twice the amount of CPU. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised this is because of higher physical modeling requirements for uprights but since I&#039;m not the devs, it&#039;s just a guess. Could Modartt confirm if this increase CPU usage is normal for the U4? Thanks.</p><p>Chuck</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[chucky5p]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2013-04-15T08:03:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=926172#p926172</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
