<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Lid open, closed, half open and *disabled*]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=27</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Lid open, closed, half open and *disabled*.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:06:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lid open, closed, half open and *disabled*]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=126#p126</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that suggestion. yes, it does sound very close..<br />The more I play this the better it gets.&nbsp; I&#039;m&nbsp; constantly amazed how good this Pianoteq instrument sounds. Thank you Modartt people.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jeffbart)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=126#p126</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lid open, closed, half open and *disabled*]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=124#p124</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>did you try the &quot;C2 bridge&quot; preset? It is very dry and has no cabinet contribution, as if the sound was picked up at the bridge level (thus very dry and a bit synthetic, but reverb can bring it to life).</p><p>Concerning C1, C2, M1 presets, they are based on a mathematical analysis of several grand pianos as mentioned in the user manual, doing a mix between several characteristics, trying to get the best of each.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Philippe Guillaume)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 06:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=124#p124</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lid open, closed, half open and *disabled*]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=100#p100</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I bought Pianoteq before v 2.x<br />The big difference between old and v2 for me was the lid open/closed element.<br />I&#039;ve kept the old version as well as the new, because the old version&#039;s sound without the lid feature just sounded more close / was just more plain in your face (especially in headphones). The new one sounds great, and definitely sounds more authentic (like i&#039;m sitting at the keyboard of a grand, and of course the middle range sounds so much better) but for more pop uses, I really like that &#039;up front&#039; sound without the lid element. I tried this out by A/B&#039;ing the common presets, and there&#039;s definitely some more &#039;room&#039; sound in the new one, and if I needed to, I don&#039;t see anyway of reducing that room element. Lid closed is not the same as the old &#039;no lid element at all&#039; </p><p>So, as a feature request, and if it doesn&#039;t impact development too much, I&#039;d love to have &#039;lid open, half open, closed and *disabled*.</p><p>Also, I have no idea which pianos C1 and C2 or M1 were modelled on. Is it listed anywhere?</p><p>cheers jeff</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jeffbart)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 01:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=100#p100</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
