Modartt user forum - Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

Re: Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (EvilDragon) — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:06:31 +0000

Would be neat if M3 got extended range, though

Re: Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (Niclas Fogwall) — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:33:47 +0000

Beto-Music wrote:

But as we know M3 have just 88 keys.

Thanks for pointing this out. We have now corrected this information on our website.

Re: Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (Beto-Music) — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:02:35 +0000

Pianoteq site says D4, K1, C3 and M3 have 105 keys (extended keyboard:

"The Pianoteq D4 and K1 virtual grand pianos (and legacy C3 and M3) offer an extended keyboard range of 105 keys. This range makes it the largest ever available in a piano."

But as we know M3 have just 88 keys.

And when we pull the keyboard to right or left to see the first or last keys, and we change to M3 model, the extra keys are frozed and became bright, instead of the keyboard return to the central position.

Re: Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (ts) — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:55:17 +0000

Thanks Julien, I will give the remapping a try. And my thanks to the team for making a Linux version.

- Tom

Re: Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (julien) — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:13:40 +0000

Hi Tom,

You can change the shortcut in options / general / edit keyboard shortcuts

Linux Plus Key Magnification Issue in 410 and 420

null@example.com (ts) — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:21:39 +0000

Hi,

The magnification feature is what convinced me to upgrade to 4. It's a wonderful addition on my 9" netbook. Thank you! It appears, however, that the + key does not work under Linux. I was able to shrink to the UI using the - key to a point where I could no longer read the menus and was unable to resize it using the + key. The issue is in both 410 and 420 using Ubuntu 12.04 32-bit OS. (Tried just <+>, tried <+>, <+>, <+> and <+>)

Thanks,
Tom