<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2533</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in The Blüthner is great; what next?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927723#p927723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You might be able to run Hauptwerk in wine on Linux.&nbsp; If they offer a free demo you should give it a try.&nbsp; &nbsp;Otherwise in linux the pipe organ options I know about are: GrandOrgue, jorgan, and Aeolus.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (varpa)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927723#p927723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927710#p927710</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Does it run on linux?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927710#p927710</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927708#p927708</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p><p>I once found a tutorial where a guy get a old real organ foot, in wood/real, and turn it into a organ MIDI controller.</p><p>Saddly I lost the link.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927708#p927708</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927706#p927706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>May I ask if you have some church organ sampler software?</p></blockquote></div><p>I might refer you to the Hauptwerk website, because instead of a generic &quot;church organ&quot;, years of work have already captured individual pipe organs from around the world.&nbsp; Here&#039;s the URL:</p><p><a href="http://www.hauptwerk.com/learn-more/overview/">http://www.hauptwerk.com/learn-more/overview/</a></p><p>Regarding hardware on which to play these sampled organs, there are 2-, 3-, and 4 manual stacks of keyboards available, plus pedalboards, and touch screens are also available with which to operate the various stops.</p><p><a href="http://www.midiworks.ca/">http://www.midiworks.ca/</a></p><p>Of course, one may operate Hauptwerk organs from a single keyboard.&nbsp; As a user, beta tester and performer of demos of certain Hauptwerk sampled pipe organs, I can attest that the software loads the entire sampled organs into the computer&#039;s RAM.&nbsp; Some of the larger organs are able to swallow 32GB of RAM, or even more.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcfelice88keys)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927706#p927706</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927703#p927703</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beto-Music wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Q: May I ask if you have some church organ sampler software? A: You just got a great answer by an expert, I just noticed. However, in general I am not a fan of samplers. I can&#039;t tolerate the sound quality (they sound recorded) and latency of most&nbsp; samplers.&nbsp; </p><p>Q: What people, users of such softwares, use as a controller? A: Not sure, but keyboard, volume pedal are a couple. You should be able to get an organ pedal controller - I think I&#039;ve seen one, but can&#039;t remember where. I would not get one since I&#039;m not a performing&nbsp; organist. </p><p>Q: Is that possible to use two keyboard by midi cable, to have two registers? A: Yes. There could also be a keyboard split function in standalone PT. Finally, if you have a keyboard and a DAW, you can layer in the sounds in parts, and even perform using say a prerecorded pedal line developed from the keyboard. You may even be able to do that in PT standalone but I do not know since I am only familiar with using a DAW. </p><p>Sorry, but I&#039;m not the best person to answer your questions. I only like the organ because of the sound, and the great music written for it. As you probably already know, it&#039;s been called the King of Instruments, by no less than Mozart.&nbsp; </p><div class="quotebox"><cite>honjr wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Bluethner is awesome! Best virtual instrument I&#039;ve ever owned. My own preferences for </p><p>Eventually, it would of course be great to see the amazing PT level of quality applied to all the other classes of instruments including:</p><p>- Concert harp (harpsichords Blanchett and Grimaldi are excellent and are also plucked instruments, and few really good virtual harps exist)</p><p>- Concert guitar</p><p>- Upright bass (plucked at first)</p><p>- Church organ</p><p>- More percussion</p><p>- Brass, woodwinds</p><p>- Strings </p><p>But even if all they offered was the Bluethner, I&#039;d be happy.</p></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (honjr)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927703#p927703</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927699#p927699</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Aside from continued improvement of the piano models, I would love to see a concert harp add-on. Perhaps include a couple Celtic harp models as well.&nbsp; I have some excellent sampled harps but I love the convenience of having so many great instruments within Pianoteq.&nbsp; I would think a harp model would not be greatly outside of the modeling parameters of a piano.&nbsp; I was surprised at how great the steel pans add-on sounds and would have thought there was more complexity than such an efficient program could deliver. <br />&nbsp; I look forward to what ever model is next!<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;-Perry-</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Studiocat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927699#p927699</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927695#p927695</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>May I ask if you have some church organ sampler software?</p><p>What people, users of such softwares, use as a controller?</p><p>Is that possible to use two keyboard by midi cable, to have two registers?</p><br /><div class="quotebox"><cite>honjr wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Bluethner is awesome! Best virtual instrument I&#039;ve ever owned. My own preferences for </p><p>Eventually, it would of course be great to see the amazing PT level of quality applied to all the other classes of instruments including:</p><p>- Concert harp (harpsichords Blanchett and Grimaldi are excellent and are also plucked instruments, and few really good virtual harps exist)</p><p>- Concert guitar</p><p>- Upright bass (plucked at first)</p><p>- Church organ</p><p>- More percussion</p><p>- Brass, woodwinds</p><p>- Strings </p><p>But even if all they offered was the Bluethner, I&#039;d be happy.</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927695#p927695</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927672#p927672</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Bluethner is awesome! Best virtual instrument I&#039;ve ever owned. My own preferences for Pianoteq developments are, in order:</p><p>1. Improve low and high end (more resonant, natural bass; less tinny high end) of Bluethner and Steinway. PT is already so close and closing the gap quickly!</p><p>2. Add Bosendorfer when done with (1) - the bass would be unreal</p><p>Eventually, it would of course be great to see the amazing PT level of quality applied to all the other classes of instruments including:</p><p>- Concert harp (harpsichords Blanchett and Grimaldi are excellent and are also plucked instruments, and few really good virtual harps exist)</p><p>- Concert guitar</p><p>- Upright bass (plucked at first)</p><p>- Church organ</p><p>- More percussion</p><p>- Brass, woodwinds</p><p>- Strings </p><p>But even if all they offered was the Bluethner, I&#039;d be happy.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (honjr)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927672#p927672</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927574#p927574</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>delt wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The blüthner is indeed awesome, i really like it.<br />After playing it for a while though, i do have one question about it.... in the mid range, around the middle C, there seems to be some kind of weird octave-doubling effect, like there are strings an octave higher resonating. Is this normal, does it sound like that on a real Blüthner?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, this is normal: in the middle range, the Blüthner strike point is such that the 8th partial (3 octaves above the fundamental) is relatively strong while the 9th is weaker. In contrast, the Steinway strike point is such that the 7th partial is relatively strong while the 8th is weaker. Thus, those 2 pianos produce a different timbre signature.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Philippe Guillaume)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 06:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927574#p927574</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927572#p927572</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s probably due the fourth string in the last 3 octaves:</p><br /><p>&quot;The Blüthner aliquot system uses an additional (hence fourth) string in each note of the top three piano octaves&quot;</p><br /><div class="quotebox"><cite>delt wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>...oh and this got skipped, just posting it again:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>delt wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The blüthner is indeed awesome, i really like it.</p><p>After playing it for a while though, i do have one question about it.... in the mid range, around the middle C, there seems to be some kind of weird octave-doubling effect, like there are strings an octave higher resonating. Is this normal, does it sound like that on a real Blüthner?</p></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 02:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927572#p927572</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927571#p927571</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>...oh and this got skipped, just posting it again:</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>delt wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>The blüthner is indeed awesome, i really like it.</p><p>After playing it for a while though, i do have one question about it.... in the mid range, around the middle C, there seems to be some kind of weird octave-doubling effect, like there are strings an octave higher resonating. Is this normal, does it sound like that on a real Blüthner?</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927571#p927571</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927570#p927570</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>got postjumped.... anyway thanks <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i> <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927570#p927570</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927569#p927569</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>delt wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>ddascher: might be a stupid question, but where can one listen to this recording?</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>At the top of the forum screen you will see an option for OTHER FILES.<br />Click on that and you will find it near or at the top of the list in that area.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ddascher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927569#p927569</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927568#p927568</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ddascher: might be a stupid question, but where can one listen to this recording?</p><p>/* edit */ nm, found it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (delt)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 01:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927568#p927568</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: The Blüthner is great; what next?]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927567#p927567</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Jake Johnson wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I wonder if some of what we have taken to calling the huff comes from the Delay setting in the Effects, or from the Initial delay setting in the Reverb. Might be worth some experimentation.</p></blockquote></div><p>You know, as I expressed earlier ... I used to fuss with those types of sound modifications with the holy grail of sound just around the corner.</p><p>Alas, it was never to be.</p><p>I now leave that to the ones that &quot;do that&quot; and I ... I just pop a sound up ... tweak a little here and there, just for fun ... and start playing.</p><p>Modartt will figure it out and much more efficiently than I could ever hope to do it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (ddascher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=927567#p927567</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
