<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - How to know what is not a crap &¨%$#@*&) for a 5.1 sound sytem ????]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2503</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in How to know what is not a crap &¨%$#@*&) for a 5.1 sound sytem ????.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to know what is not a crap &¨%$#@*&) for a 5.1 sound sytem ????]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23643#p23643</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course I know about the need of a 5.1 soundcard.&nbsp; &nbsp; Háaa háaa háaaa...&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; :-)</p><p>Ohhhnnn....5 studio monitors cost a fortune...</p><br /><br /><p>I want to know about pianoteq users who added a 5.1 system for the PC:</p><p>1-What soundsystem are you using?<br />2-How is the quality?&nbsp; How far in terms of timbre quality for piano softwares compared to a studio monitor?<br />3-What is the desavantages?<br />4-Is that really good for convolution reverb recreation of acoustic environments?<br />5-How expansive it was?</p><br /><div class="quotebox"><cite>berghs.kedjan wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Isn&#039;t it necessary to have a soundcard that supports 5.1 first of all?</p><p>Wouldn&#039;t the best 5.1 studio system be a system of 5 studiomonitors and a subb?</p></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23643#p23643</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: How to know what is not a crap &¨%$#@*&) for a 5.1 sound sytem ????]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23641#p23641</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t it necessary to have a soundcard that supports 5.1 first of all?</p><p>Wouldn&#039;t the best 5.1 studio system be a system of 5 studiomonitors and a subb?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (berghs.kedjan)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23641#p23641</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to know what is not a crap &¨%$#@*&) for a 5.1 sound sytem ????]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23640#p23640</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Just for curiosity, cause I do not really want to buy a large 5.1 system now.&nbsp; But how to check the sound quality of a given product, like a 5.1 system ?</p><p>5.1 small kits for PC are the worst thing created by man in the last 100 years.&nbsp; 100% Worthless...&nbsp; &nbsp;It&#039;s not worth even try pianoteq 5.1 sound or any good digital piano software in a system like that, unless you like your ears to blead.</p><p>But how good or bad it&#039;s a system like that for pianoteq:</p><p><a href="http://www.philco.com.br/produtos.aspx?c=110&amp;sc=161&amp;p=637">http://www.philco.com.br/produtos.aspx?...&amp;p=637</a></p><br /><p>I&#039;m sure the model of the link&nbsp; have no flat response, so it&#039;s clear noway like good sound monitors or even close. <br />Does anyones know a 5.1 system with flat response ???&nbsp; I bet it would cost a fortune...</p><br /><p>I just want to understand how worth can be a 5.1 system for pianoteq... How 5.1 advantages compared to a great stereo sound?<br />Would you sacrifice a flat response of a great stereo for a not so great sound reproduction in change of 3D sound of a 5.1 system?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beto-Music)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=23640#p23640</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
