<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2303&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2012-05-04T14:31:22Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2303</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21994#p21994"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>. . another option for a keyboard is to get a used piano . . upright or grand . . even in fair shape the action would&nbsp; (wood?) be great.&nbsp; Throw some blankets inside to silence the strings.&nbsp; Get the PnoScan optical sensor and you wind up with continuous sensing from the keys and pedals . . not to mention polyphonic aftertouch if you want to get into that too.&nbsp; Of course the above only applies if you are not planning to move the piano about.</p><p>Lanny</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[LTECpiano]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2046</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-04T14:31:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21994#p21994</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21982#p21982"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>cool thank you.</p><p>cheers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bipolartriggerrelease]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2840</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-04T12:52:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21982#p21982</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21979#p21979"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This is from Standard to Pro.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-04T10:50:43Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21979#p21979</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21978#p21978"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Here is an addition question.&nbsp; I found this:</p><p><a href="http://www.thomann.de/gb/modartt_pianoteq_pro_upgrade.htm">http://www.thomann.de/gb/modartt_pianot...pgrade.htm</a></p><p>It doesn&#039;t say for what version this upgrade is valid for.&nbsp; On the PTQ website I notice two different upgrade versions.&nbsp; One for standard to pro and one for play to pro.&nbsp; They are priced quite differently.&nbsp; This one doesn&#039;t say which it is.&nbsp; You reckon this would work as an upgrade from either version?</p><p>Thanks.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bipolartriggerrelease]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2840</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-04T08:58:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21978#p21978</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21977#p21977"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>HI all,</p><p>The roland keyboard is indeed impressive like you say.&nbsp; It would be an interesting option to combine the two and as you say they work nicely together so that would dismiss any redundancy concerns. </p><p>I think though I&#039;ve pretty much decided on the k2600 + pianoteq however.&nbsp; Apparently the k2600 is a bit of a beast of a synth as well and I can get lots of other sounds out of it.&nbsp; For the price this is pretty hard to pass up.</p><p>The point about trying to find an old version and then upgrading might be just the thing actually.&nbsp; I am UK based indeed so I&#039;ll have a look in some local music shops.&nbsp; Its worth the effort perhaps if this can be done.</p><p>Thanks everyone.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bipolartriggerrelease]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2840</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-04T08:32:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21977#p21977</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21963#p21963"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dondascher wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I am just curious as to whether you have tried blending the two in any manner ?</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes, they&#039;re going through a mixer to my headphones, so by default are mixed unless I turn one of them off! I was actually playing the D4 the other day thinking the attack was slightly more present than I remembered, when I noticed I had a bit of supernatural mixed in <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> I&#039;ve tried mixing in other ways, but the different velocity response, and subtly different tuning can cause issues. I tried just adding in the attack of the 700NX by giving it a fast decay, but it sounded a little odd.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T19:39:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21963#p21963</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21960#p21960"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This may or may not work where you are {I assume U.K. from your posts ?}</p><p>If you can find a local shop that has an OLD copy of PTQ Standard in stock you MIGHT be able to convince them that it is obsolete and should therefore be HEAVILY discounted.<br />Even a U.K. web order store.</p><p>I was able to do exactly this almost a week ago via a USA web order. {I am also in USA}<br />It arrived a couple of days ago and within minutes of registering it I was able to update to the very latest release 4.0.2.<br />Modartt really DO honor their promise of free upgrades within a year of first registration and it doesn&#039;t matter if the CD was on a re-seller&#039;s shelf for 5 years.<br />It is the date of initial registration that counts, not the release date.</p><p>It has been interesting to be able to play with 2.1 and catch up on what some of the early adopters have been talking about on the earlier releases.&nbsp; <br />I would have missed the fun of that if I had bought V4 straight away :-D</p><p>PTQ Standard may be LISTED at 249 Euros, but you don&#039;t have to PAY that.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tractor_music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2731</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T18:01:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21960#p21960</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21959#p21959"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>mooks wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>For what it&#039;s worth, I think the FP7F keyboard and supernatural piano is great and a good companion to Pianoteq. I actually have the RD700NX stage piano which has virtually the same keyboard but a few more supernatural sounds than just the grand piano (eg electric pianos).</p><p>The interesting thing is that when I switch between 700NX and Pianoteq, I always miss something in the previous thing I was playing. With pianoteq, I miss the clarity, attack, and &quot;woody&quot; resonance of the 700NX. But with the 700NX, I miss the feeling of playing a real instrument, and the beautiful complexity of sustained notes that you get in Pianoteq.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>I am just curious as to whether you have tried blending the two in any manner ?</p><p>I do that with my Kawai CA63 and Pianoteq and find that I can get some very nice tones that way.&nbsp; &nbsp; Sometimes just a touch of CA63 with Pianoteq, sometimes just a touch of Pianoteq with CA63.&nbsp; &nbsp;The options are endless and can be very satisfying.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dondascher]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2518</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T17:44:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21959#p21959</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21958#p21958"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#039;s worth, I think the FP7F keyboard and supernatural piano is great and a good companion to Pianoteq. I actually have the RD700NX stage piano which has virtually the same keyboard but a few more supernatural sounds than just the grand piano (eg electric pianos).</p><p>The interesting thing is that when I switch between 700NX and Pianoteq, I always miss something in the previous thing I was playing. With pianoteq, I miss the clarity, attack, and &quot;woody&quot; resonance of the 700NX. But with the 700NX, I miss the feeling of playing a real instrument, and the beautiful complexity of sustained notes that you get in Pianoteq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T16:23:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21958#p21958</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21957#p21957"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#039;re on a budget I&#039;d go with Play. You can always upgrade if necessary at no extra overall cost.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[moshuajusic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=801</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T16:12:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21957#p21957</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21954#p21954"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.&nbsp; The issue with the fp7f + pianoteq suggestion is really cost I guess.&nbsp; The other option is a good 500+ pounds cheaper.&nbsp; So I guess what I should have asked was people&#039;s impressions with pianoteq but there are a lot of favourable reviews on here about that.&nbsp; I think going to the store would not work since I haven&#039;t a laptop and transporting my imac around is not going to happen.&nbsp; I think I&#039;ll take a leap of faith and go for it.&nbsp; </p><p>Would you recommend the standard version or the play?&nbsp; There is a big difference in price between the two versions.</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bipolartriggerrelease]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2840</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T14:04:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21954#p21954</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21953#p21953"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Take your laptop, USB cable, and a descent set of cans to a store and try them. That&#039;s what I did. I settled on an RD-700NX, fwiw.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[moshuajusic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=801</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T13:13:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21953#p21953</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21949#p21949"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a strike of genious! <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T12:33:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21949#p21949</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21948#p21948"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can have both.</p><p>You can purchase the Roland and if you are not happy with it you can hook it into a computer and run Pianoteq.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[dondascher]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2518</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T11:46:50Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21948#p21948</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pianoteq or roland supernatural piano engine?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21941#p21941"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>I&#039;m in the market for a digital piano and am pondering a few options.&nbsp; A roland fp7f perhaps (its got something called supernatural piano engine - its very hard to discern what the hell this is from piles of roland marketing documentation) or a combination of a kurzweil k2600x and pianoteq 4.&nbsp; </p><p>I have a mate who is willing to sell me his kurzweil and it is in near new condition as far as I can tell.&nbsp; The k2600 + pianoteq is a cheaper option.</p><p>I like the feel of the keyboard on the roland (its quite impressive actually) and the sound is very convincing as far as I can tell in the store but I don&#039;t mind the k2600 keyboard either.&nbsp; Its not as evolved perhaps but it has a good enough feel.</p><p>I&#039;m leaning towards the pianoteq setup which is why I signed up here but its a bit of a chicken/egg problem for me right now because I haven&#039;t the keyboard to try out pianoteq proper.&nbsp; I&#039;m going on youtube videos and various opinions I can google around.&nbsp; I can go to the store and play the roland that&#039;s no problem but can&#039;t quite as easily demo pianoteq so I thought I&#039;d ask the question here.</p><p>Which would you guys recommend?&nbsp; How does the pianoteq stack up with this so called supernatural engine?</p><p>The excessive amount of marketing from roland has me worried (even on youtube its difficult to get an independent video on a fp7f) but the thing is pretty impressive in person.</p><p>Thanks for your input.</p><p>Cheers.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[bipolartriggerrelease]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2840</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-05-03T09:46:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21941#p21941</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
