<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - New Wurly]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2285&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2012-04-28T22:00:19Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2285</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21745#p21745"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Mooks - it appears that it is still available, but they&#039;ve changed the name to &quot;A-200&quot;. </p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-28T22:00:19Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21745#p21745</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21727#p21727"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The best I ever heard (and played) was the Scarbee WEP (samples), but I don&#039;t think you can buy this anymore. The samples were very clean with about 16 velocity layers. What really set them apart from anything else I&#039;ve heard was what happens at high velocities: a very big change in tone to a real barking sound, but still very musical and playable. I&#039;d love to hear this in a modelled wurly. Pianoteq is good, but doesn&#039;t quite get there.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[mooks]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=677</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-28T10:17:11Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21727#p21727</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21726#p21726"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think Pianoteq&#039;s sounds better. That said - I would love to see development continue in this area as well as the acoustic piano emulations.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beethree]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=882</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-28T09:18:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21726#p21726</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21721#p21721"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Just listening to the (Arturia) demos, it sounds pretty good and authentic to me. The main defect I notice so far is the attacks, which unfortunately are very important to get right. <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i>&nbsp; I agree - overall I think Pianoteq&#039;s Wurly is better. (so far)</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T22:19:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21721#p21721</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21716#p21716"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Can you ytry to recreate the effectsand reverbs of the demo from physis piano video ???</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Pianoteq&#039;s wurly seems much much better to me.</p></blockquote></div>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T18:02:54Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21716#p21716</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21707#p21707"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think PT&#039;s wurly sounds great - especially with the new effects...</p><p>just uploaded an fxp:<br /><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?id=1492">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?id=1492</a></p><p>and a demo:<br /><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?file=JJH_wurly.mp3">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p..._wurly.mp3</a></p><p>cheers<br />Hans</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[creart]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=326</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T11:13:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21707#p21707</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21702#p21702"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Pianoteq&#039;s wurly seems much much better to me.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[EvilDragon]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=618</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T09:40:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21702#p21702</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21701#p21701"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Well, I downloaded the demo version - btw this the major benefit over sampling, you can test those instruments before buying them! - and to be honest, I am not very convinced...</p><p>Is this again a sad example of modeling: thousand of different presets from &quot;funky&quot; to &quot;experimental&quot; but still no single one which is close to instrument which we call Wurlitzer?</p><p>Of course this is not fair judgement, I did not give it a real chance. But quite often first impressions are close...</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ecaroh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1032</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T09:36:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21701#p21701</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21699#p21699"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>no, it&#039;s MUCH easier !!!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-27T08:52:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21699#p21699</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21691#p21691"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link! This is indeed interesting although I am a little bit amazed that they haven&#039;t introduced a Rhodes emulation first.</p><p>There are many modeled electric pianos - the one bundled with Logic for Mac, Lounge Lizard, Mr. Ray (free), GEM, Roland, Pianoteq...</p><p>Seems it&#039;s easier to recreate an electric piano through modeling rather than an acoustic piano.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[CyberGene]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1252</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-26T22:44:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21691#p21691</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[New Wurly]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21690#p21690"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p><p>Did you already saw this:</p><p><a href="http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/wurlitzer-v/intro.html">http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/pro...intro.html</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Ecaroh]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1032</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-04-26T22:10:14Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=21690#p21690</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
