<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Problem with Sympathetic Resonance]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2179</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Problem with Sympathetic Resonance.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:23:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem with Sympathetic Resonance]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19843#p19843</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ah, right you are... I was thinking about it wrong.&nbsp; It works just fine.&nbsp; &nbsp;<i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TheBayer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19843#p19843</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem with Sympathetic Resonance]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19829#p19829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Another take on what Joe said:</p><p>I often get to look at several grands (a friend is a dealer/tech) and I occasionally check SR by holding one key while striking the appropriate one below (having a senior moment here as I forget the interval - I think I strike the one a fifth below the one I&#039;m holding silently).</p><p>Incidentally, I find that the amount of resonance varies considerably varies from piano to piano.</p><p>With my own digital with Pianoteq, I do the same test, and adjust the amount of SR to approximate that of the C7 Yamaha.</p><p>From this, I know that Pianoteq does model SR very well - it may be even more consistent than that of an acoustic piano.</p><p>Try the test on an acoustic, then on Pianoteq - I think you might be surprised.</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19829#p19829</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem with Sympathetic Resonance]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19826#p19826</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>TheBayer wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>&lt;....&gt;<br />If you have adjacent notes held down, you should hear sympathetic resonance in the held notes as well.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hello Mr. Bayer,</p><p>As far as I understand, Pianoteq already does incorporate this form of sympathetic resonance with other notes that are depressed -- the only caveat is that the extra notes you have played ... need to be aligned with the natural harmonic series of the original note, for them to be heard.&nbsp; This specifically does not require that the damper pedal be depressed for you to hear the effect.</p><p>The best way for you to demonstrate it for yourself is to slowly depress and hold down a C major chord, around Middle C.&nbsp; As these strings are not vibrating, but their particular dampers are released, now &quot;punch&quot; a loud, staccato low C note, two octaves below middle C -- with no pedals held down during this experiment.</p><p>What you will hear, after punching and releasing the low C, is the original C major chord now resonating in those previously quiet C, E and G strings.&nbsp; Those nine (3 tones times 3 strings per tone) undampened strings are now vibrating in sympathy with the corresponding 4th, 5th and 6th overtones in the natural harmonic series of that low C note.</p><p>As is correct to theory, if you had played a low E while still holding the original C major chord, you will correctly hear <span class="bbu">only</span> the middle E note in the C Major chord, because the C and the G of that chord do not correspond to the natural harmonic series of that low E.</p><p>Hopefully this helps convince you that, what you wish for ... already exists in the Pianoteq model.</p><br /><p>Cheers,</p><p>Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcfelice88keys)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19826#p19826</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Problem with Sympathetic Resonance]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19825#p19825</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So I&#039;ve been very impressed with Pianoteq 3.&nbsp; I had checked it out in its early days and not been so thrilled, but I was in love with the concept.</p><p>Recently a friend asked about pianos and synthesis and I decided to check out Pianoteq again.&nbsp; I am very impressed now, but I notice a really nasty limitation to the current Sympathetic Resonance model.&nbsp; Currently it only seems to be active when holding down the sustain pedal.&nbsp; Though this is certainly a time you would notice it, the other common case is not modeled.</p><p>If you have adjacent notes held down, you should hear sympathetic resonance in the held notes as well.&nbsp; Depending on how the current system works this could either be very simple to implement (if there is a impulse placed on adjacent key strings) or very hard (if the sympathetic resonance is handled as a impulse response for the whole soundboard worth of strings).</p><p>Is this something that could/would readily be fixed?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (TheBayer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19825#p19825</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
