<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Notebook with AMD E-350 CPU and 64-bit Linux]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2172&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2012-02-14T08:32:44Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2172</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Notebook with AMD E-350 CPU and 64-bit Linux]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19787#p19787"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m runninng Pianoteq on Ubuntu GNU/Linux 11.10 with Linux 3.2 (generic) and ALSA. I tried Jack a while ago and in my case it had actually more latency than ALSA. I&#039;m happy with the result: it was very easy to set it up and it just works.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[grimborg]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1727</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-14T08:32:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19787#p19787</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Notebook with AMD E-350 CPU and 64-bit Linux]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19784#p19784"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>JerryKnight wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m surprised. I haven&#039;t been keeping up with AMD&#039;s processor technologies, but it would seem that the Bobcat is a stout little processor core. I would say big thanks also to AMD.</p></blockquote></div><p>You can think of the AMD E-350 being some kind of Intel atom, but with faster graphics, two real cores, 64-bit and virtualization technology.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>JerryKnight wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;m curious - what does PTQ say the the CPU&#039;s performance index is? My aging Core2Duo (2.9GHz, MacbookPro) gives a number in the 50-55 range.</p></blockquote></div><p>The performance index is 14 with my setup from above.</p><p>- groovy</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[groovy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-14T07:13:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19784#p19784</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Notebook with AMD E-350 CPU and 64-bit Linux]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19780#p19780"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m surprised. I haven&#039;t been keeping up with AMD&#039;s processor technologies, but it would seem that the Bobcat is a stout little processor core. I would say big thanks also to AMD.</p><p>I&#039;m curious - what does PTQ say the the CPU&#039;s performance index is? My aging Core2Duo (2.9GHz, MacbookPro) gives a number in the 50-55 range.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[JerryKnight]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=983</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-13T21:09:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19780#p19780</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Notebook with AMD E-350 CPU and 64-bit Linux]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19763#p19763"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I haven&#039;t been in the forum for months but now I have a new, inexpensive notebook and maybe it is interesting for someone, how it works.</p><p>The notebook is a low budget HP 635, which costs 270 EUR where I live. It has a true dual-core AMD E-350 CPU with 64-bit support, 1.6 GHz and 4 GB RAM.</p><p>I installed my preferred Linux-Distribution Debian/wheezy with AMD64 architecture. In new distributions one can select a realtime-kernel now, which is a great progress (no compilation needed anymore)! The kernel I&#039;m now running is Linux version 3.2.0-1-rt-amd64.</p><p>The installed sound-system is just plain alsa (no additional jackd or sound-servers) and the mixer is kmix (I have a KDE4 desktop). The onboard soundcard for play is a Realtek ALC270 and provides Intel HDA standards.</p><p>I installed the 64-bit trial version of Pianoteq v3.6.8. (pianoteq_linux_trial_x64.zip).</p><p>The only realtime-optimizations I did so far are that from Piantoteq&#039;s README_LINUX.txt:</p><p>* In /etc/security/limits.conf<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;@audio - rtprio 90<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;@audio - nice -10<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;@audio - memlock 500000</p><p>* Nailing both cpu-cores to max. cpufreq:<br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cpufreq-set -c 0 -g performance <br />&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cpufreq-set -c 1 -g performance</p><p>With an USB-attached midi-interface and my keyboard I&#039;m playing without any glitches at 44100 Hz, buffersize 64 and polyphony 48 at the moment. Big thanks to Pianoteq!</p><p>- groovy</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[groovy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1021</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-12T10:41:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19763#p19763</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
