<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Looking for faster decay]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2139</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Looking for faster decay.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:24:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Looking for faster decay]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19479#p19479</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dondascher wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Ok, thanks for the replies.</p><p>Those are the things I fool with also.&nbsp; &nbsp;I just wanted to find out if there was some &quot;magic&quot; (more effective) way of dealing with this.</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>Hello Don,</p><p>Here is an idea for an experiment you may wish to conduct for yourself.&nbsp; If you can find physical access to a particular piano whose notes&#039; decay rate is pleasing to you -- make a recording of individual notes at a number of loudnesses per note.&nbsp; Let&#039;s say, for example, Middle C, and the C&#039;s residing two octaves above and below Middle C.</p><p>Play back your recordings in the presence of a Pianoteq setup, perhaps in headphones with one channel representing a mono signal of the real piano, and the other channel with Pianoteq.&nbsp; Your mission (if you decide to accept it, Mr. Phelps) is to leave the impedance untouched, and see if you can duplicate the decay rate of your Middle C via Direct Sound Duration.&nbsp; Assuming you find a reasonable setting, leave that setting alone, and see if that modified setting also works for two octaves ABOVE middle C.&nbsp; If it still works, then you are ahead of the game.&nbsp; If it doesn&#039;t also work, THEN adjust the impedance slider to bring that C into alignment.&nbsp; Then proceed to the C residing two octaves below Middle C.</p><p>This may take a few iterations of adjusting first the Direct Sound Duration followed by slight corrections with the Impedance slider.</p><p>I, and possibly many other forum members, would be interested in the results of your informal experiment.&nbsp; &nbsp;Happy exploring!</p><br /><p>Cheers,</p><p>Joe</p><p>P.S.&nbsp; Personally, I do not adjust Direct Sound Duration nor Impedance -- but then, I&#039;m very happy with the sound.&nbsp; You are free to feel differently about this than I.&nbsp; This is precisely why I suggest that you perform an experiment such as the one described above.&nbsp; In the end, you will derive a great deal of personal satisfaction from taming the Pianoteq beast to your own specifications.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcfelice88keys)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19479#p19479</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Looking for faster decay]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19476#p19476</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thanks for the replies.</p><p>Those are the things I fool with also.&nbsp; &nbsp;I just wanted to find out if there was some &quot;magic&quot; (more effective) way of dealing with this.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dondascher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 15:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19476#p19476</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Looking for faster decay]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19475#p19475</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes to Joe&#039;s comments, and also try the impedance adjustment.</p><p>Glenn</p><p>PS - I&#039;m in agreement with Don - the decay seems a bit long to me too.&nbsp; But of course we should not forget that typically PT is modeling large grands - concert size that do have longer sustain than most pianos we actually play in everyday life.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Glenn NK)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 07:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19475#p19475</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Looking for faster decay]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19472#p19472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hello Don,</p><p>My first choice would be to experiment by moving the &quot;Direct Sound Duration&quot; slider in the Upper Leftmost window (Tuning Window).&nbsp; I believe the default position has a value of 1.00; if you were to move the slider to the right, you will notice the decay will be increased and the sound will die away faster.&nbsp; Just beware that a little movement in the positive direction may have a profound effect on the sustain length.&nbsp; You may also wish to experiment by varying the Direct Duration slider for low notes (long strings), middle- and high notes to achieve the effect you desire.</p><p>Hope this helps.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Joe</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (jcfelice88keys)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19472#p19472</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Looking for faster decay]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19471#p19471</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I strike a piano key and hold it down, the tone lingers too long for my taste.</p><p>I would like to effect the decay time on the tones.&nbsp; &nbsp;I could use some suggestions for ways to do that most efficiently and without modifying the sound too much.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (dondascher)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 04:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19471#p19471</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
