<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2101&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2012-02-17T16:54:33Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2101</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19823#p19823"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>Nice effort but it&#039;s still dull when played softly. What I miss from the sound is &#039;air&#039;. And I&#039;m comparing it to the sound of a real Bösendorfer recorded in a pro studio last month. You can eq and compress Pianoteq all you want, but you get artificially ringing overtones and larger that life noises at most. No &#039;air&#039;. I&#039;m beginning to doubt if it is even possible to achieve by the physical modeling approach.</p><p>So, yeah, it&#039;s rich but dull. Great for Debussy. Not so great for jazz or pop. I&#039;m sorry I have to say it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[benyig]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2352</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-02-17T16:54:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19823#p19823</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19655#p19655"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p><p>Sorry about the delay, but here&#039;s the preset I made a while ago. I&#039;ve been playing with it quite a bit and I think that&#039;s a pretty good sign.</p><p>Anyway, it&#039;s what I was looking for (which I can&#039;t believe that Pianoteq didn&#039;t already have...a bright, cutting, rock and roll piano...that doesn&#039;t lack in depth and richness.</p><p><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/97806c24012c5952a19451025b43f22b">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/97806c240...025b43f22b</a></p><p>Let me know what you think.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pizzafilms]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2512</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2012-01-27T04:59:29Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19655#p19655</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19407#p19407"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>pizzafilms wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I&#039;ll post a preset or 2 in the next couple of days for anyone else to hear. I&#039;d love your opinions.</p></blockquote></div><p>Eagerly waiting ... ;-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Rob_Kastler]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=157</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-12-17T11:24:23Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19407#p19407</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19233#p19233"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>pizzafilms wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Thanks to jcfelice88keys&#039;s suggestions and a bit of work, I finally got a sound I was hoping for...A rich, detailed piano that&#039;s less classical in nature and more rock or jazz. I also bought the standard version and have been playing almost nonstop ever since. Definitely a good sign.</p></blockquote></div><p>You could share your FXP preset via the &#039;FXP Corner&#039; link on the website. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[DonSmith]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=736</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-30T06:40:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19233#p19233</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19230#p19230"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to jcfelice88keys&#039;s suggestions and a bit of work, I finally got a sound I was hoping for...A rich, detailed piano that&#039;s less classical in nature and more rock or jazz. I also bought the standard version and have been playing almost nonstop ever since. Definitely a good sign.</p><p>It turns out that the K1 &quot;close mic&quot; preset has 2 other mics far to the left of the piano besides the 2 main mics. Also, none of the &quot;close mic&quot; presets are what I would have called &quot;close&quot;. They&#039;re still placed pretty far from the hammers and therefore lose some of the high end of the strike. Closer to the hammers is more in keeping with a rock/jazz approach than a classical one.</p><p>My &quot;go to&quot; preset at the moment is a variation of the C3 close mic preset. It&#039;s in your face but still has plenty of richness. I actually like it much better than the so-called rock piano YC5.</p><p>I&#039;ll post a preset or 2 in the next couple of days for anyone else to hear. I&#039;d love your opinions.</p><p>Thanks again...and now, back to playing... <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pizzafilms]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2512</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-30T00:02:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19230#p19230</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19151#p19151"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>the K1 &quot;close mic&quot; is a good starting point, you could/should also add some compression: that&#039;s a must for a rock piano sound, and it will probably seem brighter too.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T13:49:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19151#p19151</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19150#p19150"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I feel the same way, but I think that one problem is that we so easely adapt to the &quot;Sampeled sound&quot;, that differ a lot to the real pianosound. So when we hear à mugg reacher pianosound from our electric gear we think its to round and very different from the dead, often quite hard, Sampeled sound. So, I think we need to compare with &quot;the real thing&quot;!</p><p>Good luck!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[berghs.kedjan]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1009</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T12:15:38Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19150#p19150</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19144#p19144"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much. I&#039;ll give this a try over the next few days.</p><p>But I&#039;m still a little curious...isn&#039;t it odd that there&#039;s no standard preset that sounds relatively bright? Like I said, even the YC5 Rock piano doesn&#039;t sound very &quot;cut through the mix&quot;, at least not to my ears. Curious...</p><p>I should not go without saying that everything else...the richness of tone and character is amazing. There&#039;s a lot to explore.</p><p>Thanks again.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pizzafilms]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2512</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T07:47:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19144#p19144</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19143#p19143"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, and welcome to this forum.</p><p>The standard version of Pianoteq allows one to vary the hardness values of the felt hammers, corresponding to low-, middle- and high note-on velocities.&nbsp; If this is what you desire, you can even emulate a tack piano, without having to resort to EQ changes.</p><p>Other things you can do are to vary the strike points along the pianos&#039; strings.&nbsp; These have the effect of emphasizing certain harmonics, preferentially, over other harmonics in the harmonic series.</p><p>Still other other options include varying the relative loudnesses of the individual harmonic series within given strings.&nbsp; This is not the same thing as EQ, because the latter only raises or lowers the loudness (and modifies the phase angles) of sounds within a given spectral range.&nbsp; By modifying the spectral content of individual strings, or groups of strings, or the whole piano, you can get this Pianoteq thing to sizzle -- again, without having to resort to EQ and its resultant audio artifacts.</p><p>Perhaps there are other factors that can be modified, but these are the first to come to mind.&nbsp; Hope this helps.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Joe</p><p>EDIT:&nbsp; Oh yes, there is another factor you can control, which will make interesting contributions to the sound:&nbsp; Try REDUCING the string length from its standard 2.70m down to its lowest value.&nbsp; This will introduce &quot;inharmonicity&quot; into the sound.&nbsp; The shortest explanation of inharmonicity is that the higher registers of the piano will sound more &quot;bell-like&quot;.&nbsp; &lt;end Edit&gt;</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[jcfelice88keys]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=734</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T04:21:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19143#p19143</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Looking for a bright, twinkly, cutting sound...]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19141#p19141"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone, new guy here. So new, in fact, I haven&#039;t purchased Pianoteq yet and I&#039;m just demoing.</p><p>I&#039;ve been playing with the presets that come with Play and the standard version, and it seems that everything sounds a little dull. Rich, yes, but not very bright. (and yes, I&#039;m listening through decent speakers/in-ears)</p><p>What I&#039;m looking for is something similar to Ivory&#039;s Studio 7Ft Bright Rock Studio Grand, or True Piano&#039;s Diamond Rock presets. Something like a David Benoit sound. I don&#039;t seem to find anything like that...which surprises me.</p><p>Yes, I know I can tweak up the EQ, but it seems that everything sounds so classical in nature...unless I&#039;m missing something, which I very well could be. I tried the YC5 Rock piano and that wasn&#039;t much better at all. The closest I could get was from the K1 close mic and even then, tweak up the EQ quite a bit.</p><p>Sorry if this is lame. Any help would be appreciated.</p><p>Thanks!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[pizzafilms]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2512</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-23T02:30:34Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19141#p19141</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
