<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - performance of 32 bit vs 64 bit linux version]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2093&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2011-11-19T12:02:22Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=2093</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: performance of 32 bit vs 64 bit linux version]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19106#p19106"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Yes, on x86 CPUs, the number of available registers has been doubled in 64-bit mode (both standard integer registers and SSE floating point registers). In some situtations this allows the compiler to avoid unnecessary memory accesses and produce faster code.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-19T12:02:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19106#p19106</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: performance of 32 bit vs 64 bit linux version]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19104#p19104"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Julien,</p><p>Thanks for the info. Does the 64-bit version use extra CPU instructions that are not available in 32-bit mode? Otherwise one would have expected the 64-bit pointers to be a drag on performance.</p><p>Cheers<br />Neilen</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[brickZA]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2504</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-19T07:22:01Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19104#p19104</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: performance of 32 bit vs 64 bit linux version]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19097#p19097"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The 64-bit version is 10-15% faster than the 32-bit version on windows, but as far as I recall, the difference is&nbsp; smaller on linux, maybe 5% only. But if you have the choice, pick up the 64-bit version, it won&#039;t hurt.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-18T19:33:59Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19097#p19097</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[performance of 32 bit vs 64 bit linux version]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19096#p19096"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Is there any performance advantage to running either the 32-bit or 64-bit version? I&#039;m going to be using a machine with 1 GB of RAM as a dedicated pianoteq host. All else being equal, 32-bit versions are usually faster (unless you need the extra memory), but there may be exceptions. What is the case for pianoteq?</p><p>Cheers<br />Neilen</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[brickZA]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2504</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-11-18T13:00:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=19096#p19096</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
