<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs)]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1940</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 02:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17384#p17384</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My thinking is that simpler is better. Having Pianoteq as a complete standalone piano solution, without external effects, has a lot of appeal. One clean, simple interface. </p><p>But to be that, IMO, the effects should be improved upon. A real stereo chorus, not detuned unisons. A better tremolo- both the Pianoteq Rhodes and Mr Ray73 Mark II sound great to my ear, but I think Mr Ray&#039;s tremolo is way better. And at least have low and high damping on the Pianoteq reverb- it&#039;s a nice reverb, but not very flexible. I won&#039;t even get into convolution reverb. My two cents anyway <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 02:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17384#p17384</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17322#p17322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Olepro, the demos certainly sound very good. (haven&#039;t tried it with Pianoteq yet)&nbsp; I know there are a plethora of other chorus VSTs out there too. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Greg.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (skip)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17322#p17322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17319#p17319</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Put this on the EP instead, it sounds soo good<br /><a href="http://www.audiodamage.com/effects/product.php?pid=AD016">http://www.audiodamage.com/effects/prod...?pid=AD016</a></p><p>Some times it would be great if Pianoteq could host vst effects when used stand-alone.<br />The E-piano effects inside Pianoteq is just not good enough...<br />But, there are some free vst hosts to use Pianoteq inside where you can chain effects allso, that&#039;s maybe the best solution anyway</p><p>Try the Audio Damage chorus, it is really good</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (olepro)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 06:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17319#p17319</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Small suggestion for improving the Chorus effect (EPs)]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17303#p17303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I suggest an option to randomly vary the initial phase of the unison voices for the Chorus effect, because at the moment repeated strikes sound too similar to one another. (I am assuming that the Chorus effect is simply created by detuning the unisons, of course.)</p><p>What I hear is that the effect has exactly the same initial &quot;sweep&quot; sound for repeated strikes, which is not always desirable.</p><br /><p>Greg.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (skip)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17303#p17303</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
