<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Very Interesting Test of Expressiveness]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1914&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2011-04-29T23:15:04Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1914</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Very Interesting Test of Expressiveness]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17067#p17067"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The article&#039;s author doesn&#039;t seem to get that Daniel Levitin and the other psychologists studying music perception are not studying music; they are studying human perception. The point of the exercise is not to tell composers how to compose better music but to better understand how humans work. </p><p>This study is one of hundreds in music perception and cognition. There&#039;s at least one scholarly journal devoted to this. It&#039;s called &quot;Music Perception&quot; and is published by the University of California Press: <a href="http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.asp?j=mp">http://ucpressjournals.com/journal.asp?j=mp</a>.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[doug]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=18</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-04-29T23:15:04Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17067#p17067</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Very Interesting Test of Expressiveness]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17065#p17065"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and funny in the meantime. Funny because I think is a waste of resources to found what scienist discovered here; I mean, it is the first thing you learn in studying music (or maybe I&#039;m missing the point?)</p><p>I also missed one (the first one) but after close listening I continued to prefer the 50% one <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> Probably because I think the timing interpretation of the pianist is exaggerated and the mixed one sounds better to my taste.</p><p>Anyway thank you Glenn for posting it.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[etto]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=662</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-04-29T21:46:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17065#p17065</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Very Interesting Test of Expressiveness]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17062#p17062"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Found this site through a newsletter from Harmony Central website).</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/04/18/science/20110419-music-expression.html?nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=thab1&amp;audienceId=17398077&amp;tiid=8199">http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011...;tiid=8199</a></p><p>It&#039;s a real life test devised by some music researchers into what make music expressive.</p><p>Hint:&nbsp; take your time (I was in a rush to see &quot;how good&quot; I was, and missed one.&nbsp; Upon a more careful listening I found the right one, so generally am happy with my ability).</p><p>Being a Chopin afficionado, I&#039;ve listened to many recordings and/or midi files of these selections - the midi versions may have influenced my choice on the one I missed (sounds like an excuse doesn&#039;t it).</p><p>Glenn</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Glenn NK]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=750</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-04-29T19:14:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17062#p17062</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
