<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=188&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2008-01-11T17:31:02Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=188</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1174#p1174"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tconrardy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>To be honest, I have not put Pianoteq on Receptor yet, as I am sure there is some fiddling with registration procedure. How did you get it on yours?</p><p>Tim</p></blockquote></div><p>it&#039;s a supported plugin ! you can get the file @plugorama. <br />didn&#039;t have any problems - worked fine from the very beginning <i class="far fa-smile-wink smiley"></i></p><p>robert</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wizard_of_keys]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=50</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-11T17:31:02Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1174#p1174</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1173#p1173"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>guillaume wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Welcome Tim! The parameters included in the fxp files are a small&nbsp; part of those included in the models (the ptq files), thus as you say, the user has less access to the parameters than we do when designing a model. It&#039;s a bit like an iceberg: upper part is fxp and underwater is ptq.</p><p>We are currently working on a future pro version that will offer the possibility to the user to adjust the current parameters for each note. But this is a very important work and it still will take a long time before it is ready.</p></blockquote></div><p>I see..I really look forward to the pro version then, as that will be a sound designers dream for Physical Modeling. I am sure that a lot more instruments could be created other then piano&#039;s as well.</p><p>Tim</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tconrardy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=383</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-11T17:14:06Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1173#p1173</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1172#p1172"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>wizard_of_keys wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>tconrardy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Happy to be aboard..and maybe some of my friends for kvr are here too.</p><p>Tim</p></blockquote></div><p>not sure if I&#039;m a friend. but I know you <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i><br />I&#039;m using pianoteq both studio and esp. on stage with Receptor! <br />works perfectly, doesn&#039;t it ? <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> </p><p>combinded with some M42-pads ..mmhhm.. yummy <i class="far fa-grin-tongue-squint smiley"></i></p><p>best<br />robert</p></blockquote></div><p>Hi Robert</p><p>Yeah..I suppose layered with M42, it would be great! To be honest, I have not put Pianoteq on Receptor yet, as I am sure there is some fiddling with registration procedure. How did you get it on yours?</p><p>Anybody try out this patch? Does it sound like a dulcimer in your eyes? I have more coming up.</p><p>Tim</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tconrardy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=383</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-11T17:11:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1172#p1172</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1110#p1110"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>tconrardy wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Happy to be aboard..and maybe some of my friends for kvr are here too.</p><p>Tim</p></blockquote></div><p>not sure if I&#039;m a friend. but I know you <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i><br />I&#039;m using pianoteq both studio and esp. on stage with Receptor! <br />works perfectly, doesn&#039;t it ? <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> </p><p>combinded with some M42-pads ..mmhhm.. yummy <i class="far fa-grin-tongue-squint smiley"></i></p><p>best<br />robert</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[wizard_of_keys]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=50</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-06T14:42:09Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1110#p1110</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1096#p1096"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Tim! The parameters included in the fxp files are a small&nbsp; part of those included in the models (the ptq files), thus as you say, the user has less access to the parameters than we do when designing a model. It&#039;s a bit like an iceberg: upper part is fxp and underwater is ptq.</p><p>We are currently working on a future pro version that will offer the possibility to the user to adjust the current parameters for each note. But this is a very important work and it still will take a long time before it is ready.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-04T08:25:57Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1096#p1096</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[HI and Hammr Dulcimer]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1089#p1089"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi All</p><p>Saw the thread on kvr about Pianoteq and after downloading the demo, I was hooked and got it immediately..I think this was my first &#039;impulse&#039; buy..but NO regrets!</p><p>I already created a preset and uploaded it to the file section</p><p><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?file=HammeredDulcimar-TC.fxp">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...mar-TC.fxp</a></p><p>It best to use the sustain pedal while playing it so the notes ring out..but it&#039;s pretty close. I like it, and this opens the door to other &#039;stringed&quot; instruments as well. </p><p>The piano&#039;s are amazing, but also looking forward to all the sound design you can do.<br />However..I have a Q: are the &quot;models&quot; different then fxp files?..can you create all of that within what is seen on the GUI of Pianoteq?..or..do only the dev&#039;s have the inner working to create a model?</p><p>Happy to be aboard..and maybe some of my friends for kvr are here too.</p><p>Tim</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[tconrardy]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=383</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2008-01-04T00:40:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=1089#p1089</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
