<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=18&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2007-06-04T06:45:22Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=18</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125#p125"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>stubbsonic wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I am curious though whether these models are based on typical stereo recordings with the usual phase discrepancies between channels. And if so, how did Modartt correct the phase distortion?</p></blockquote></div><p>stereo is based on physical modelling of the soundboard and the nearby environment,&nbsp; and mono is not the sum of the 2 chanels, it is an intermediate position issued from the model.<br />Another thing: the mono setting is based on the loudspeakers output settings, not the headphones ones, thus is dryer than the headphones output</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-06-04T06:45:22Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=125#p125</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=83#p83"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in the &quot;pan&quot; parameter, which is <em>not</em> right-left but something different that is better heard than described. </p><p>Also, if you click the word &quot;presets&quot; at the top of the reverb section, you&#039;ll find player/orchestra/audience presets, though I can&#039;t say how accurate they are.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[doug]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=18</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-05-29T22:06:55Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=83#p83</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=82#p82"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I guess having some mic options would be interesting. For myself, I&#039;d prefer to have two &quot;perspective&quot; options: Player &amp; Audience.</p><p>In either case, the Mid-Side approach to the stereo would allow us to control width without ANY tonal change-- and it would provide a perfect mono option.</p><p>I suppose I should reword my questions:</p><p>1. Did the recording/mic positioning influence the phase coherence of the models?</p><p>2. What measures could be taken in future models to improve the mono compatibility?</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[stubbsonic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=60</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-05-29T21:23:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=82#p82</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=81#p81"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As Beta tester I remamber some of us requested&nbsp; option to set virtual microphones, and option to change their location, along a virtual soundbord.&nbsp; Also sugested to number of microphones and how high away from soundboard.</p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; For a professional verison it would really be interesting.</p><p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Also was sugested 5.1 sound output. Let&#039;s give time to Pianoteq team, they have much work to do.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beto-Music]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=8</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-05-29T18:52:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=81#p81</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Curious about MONO feature of models]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=72#p72"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I often play live through a mono amp. And I often create audio that will be played on devices with one speaker. A lack of mono-compatibility remains a major problem for many sample-based piano sounds.</p><p>That is why I was so pleased that Modartt overtly included a mono-setting.</p><p>Pianoteq&#039;s mono setting doesn&#039;t have the usual &quot;horribles&quot; in the middle range-- that are typical with stereo piano samples being summed to mono. (The distance between microphones is often related to the wavelengths of problem frequencies.) But I do still notice a slight tonal shift in the range around middle C with the mono setting on.</p><p>I am curious though whether these models are based on typical stereo recordings with the usual phase discrepancies between channels. And if so, how did Modartt correct the phase distortion?</p><p>I&#039;m wondering if Modartt might consider creating either: models based on Mid-Side recordings, OR maybe a few nice models that are specifically designed to be pure mono models.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[stubbsonic]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=60</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2007-05-28T20:20:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=72#p72</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
