<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1799</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15352#p15352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is typically a ~10-15% performance improvement when switching to 64-bit . Regarding the FL Studio issue, I don&#039;t think that fl studio is 64-bit so the 32-bit pianoteq version must be used instead.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (julien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15352#p15352</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15337#p15337</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>EvilDragon wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Pianoteq doesn&#039;t have any merit from 64-bits at all, since it doesn&#039;t use a lot of RAM anyways.</p></blockquote></div><p>I am not sure this statement is completely accurate.&nbsp; I agree Pianoteq does not use much RAM.&nbsp; However, 64 bit math calculation could be faster than 32 bit math calculation.&nbsp; Can Pianoteq staff verify this?&nbsp; I am on the verge of purchasing a 64 bit machine so I can run the 64 bit Pianoteq.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (mwinthrop)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15337#p15337</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15332#p15332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how well FL handles 64-bit plugins?</p><br /><p>Perhaps try using 32-bit version as a fallback solution - Pianoteq doesn&#039;t have any merit from 64-bits at all, since it doesn&#039;t use a lot of RAM anyways.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (EvilDragon)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15332#p15332</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pianoteq not working with FL studio 9.1]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15331#p15331</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just installed the pianoteq VST instrument for use with FL Studio, and I get an odd message.&nbsp; &quot;there was a problem opening PIANOTEQ 64 bit for some unknown reason.&nbsp; Please make sure it was installed properly.&quot;&nbsp; Before when I was using Windows XP, it worked fine.&nbsp; Not sure whats going on.&nbsp; Here are my specs:</p><p>Core I7 950 3.07GHz<br />4 Gb RAM<br />Windows 7 Pro 64 bit (6.1 build 7600)<br />NVidia Quadro FX 3700<br />Realtek High Def audio<br />DirectX 11<br />PianoTeq 3.6<br />FL studio 9.1</p><p>Anyone else have this problem?&nbsp; All my drivers are up to date and my VST&#039;s have been installed properly, it is just the pianoteq VST.&nbsp; The standalone pianoteq works fine.&nbsp; Thanks</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (breachofmind)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15331#p15331</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
