<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1755&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2011-01-06T00:36:41Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1755</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15014#p15014"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Note that I do see the red CPU spikes when running at a polyphony of 64 voices every now &amp; then, so 48 is probably safer. Haven&#039;t heard any clicks yet though.</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-06T00:36:41Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15014#p15014</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15012#p15012"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Papi, that should give you really nice performance, congrats!</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-05T22:06:44Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15012#p15012</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15011#p15011"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>skip wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Michael,<br />My netbook P.I is 10. </p><p>Cheers,<br />Greg.</p></blockquote></div><p>Thanks Greg, it&#039;s the same as mine then, not too shabby.</p><p>Michael</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-05T22:04:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15011#p15011</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15004#p15004"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>iaoranaemaeva wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Papi wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I looked for a Dell Latitude, but they don&#039;t sell it here (France)</p></blockquote></div><p>They do, Papi! 6 months ago, I bought my <em>Tablet-PC Latitude XT2</em> via their French webpage, from section <em>Petites et moyennes entreprises</em>.</p><p>P.I.= 19</p></blockquote></div><p>Yes what a shame, I didn&#039;t look in the PME side of dell.fr ! I saw it after during my search, I thought the prices where really attractive, until I realized I had to add the 20% TVA.</p><p>Anyway, I found a used Dell M1330 with a T9300, 4GB RAM and 320 GB HD at 7200 rpm which should do the work, so my search is ended. Thanks everybody for the help !</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Papi]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1788</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-05T07:59:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15004#p15004</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15003#p15003"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />My netbook P.I is 10. </p><p>Cheers,<br />Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-05T05:47:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=15003#p15003</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14990#p14990"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Papi wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>I looked for a Dell Latitude, but they don&#039;t sell it here (France)</p></blockquote></div><p>They do, Papi! 6 months ago, I bought my <em>Tablet-PC Latitude XT2</em> via their French webpage, from section <em>Petites et moyennes entreprises</em>.</p><p>P.I.= 19</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[iaoranaemaeva]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=405</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-04T18:36:28Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14990#p14990</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14984#p14984"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Thanks - yes - all ok, and I even have power back.&nbsp; I was thinking how great real pianos are - they just keep working. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>It is HIGHLY unlikely that an audio interface sample rate of 96000 would be any better than 48000. Remember, Pianoteq is already limiting it&#039;s bandwidth to 24000/2 = 12kHz (the Nyquist rate, which you may have heard of) , so NOTHING we can do after Pianoteq can restore frequencies greater than 12kHz. </p><p>Without getting into the nitty gritty of sampling theory, it is TECHNICALLY possible for the fidelity to be better with Pianoteq generating audio at 24000, and then &quot;up sampling&quot; to 96000, than it would be for Pianoteq to be up sampling only to 48000Hz.&nbsp; It depends on how good Pianoteq is at performing sample rate conversion, and how good the audio interface is at filtering each sample rate to produce the analog output signal.&nbsp; &nbsp;I&#039;d be a bit surprised if anyone could notice any difference, however. The main factor is the loss of bandwidth due to the rather low internal rate (24000Hz), and that&#039;s why I think it makes more sense to slosh less data around and use a lower interface rate.&nbsp; (btw, I realise that 24000Hz is not all that bad for piano sounds. It might be a bit different if Pianoteq ever models cymbals ;^)</p><p>I forget the P.I - I&#039;ll check next time I use it. </p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-04T11:06:42Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14984#p14984</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14977#p14977"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, that&#039;s nasty Greg, good thing your ears are ok!</p><p>Regarding the netbook settings, I&#039;m also using Asio4All, and my performance index is usually 9-10. What&#039;s your PI?<br /> Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I was under the impression that a higher sample rate for the audio interface, not Pianoteq&#039;s internal sample rate, would improve audio quality. Of course, for gigs the noise floor is so high that it wouldn&#039;t make much difference.</p><p>Michael</p><p>p.s. get out the candles and flashlight <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-03T21:37:52Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14977#p14977</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14972#p14972"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t believe it. </p><p>I was just using my netbook, with ear buds, and there was a thunder strike, and I received a small electric shock in my ears!!!&nbsp; </p><p>I was NOT running on battery power. Drats. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i> I should have taken Michael&#039;s advice!!!!</p><p>Fortunately all my equipment (and my ears!) seems to be ok. I am typing this on battery power, and I have internet access due to my UPS. ;^) ;^)&nbsp; (power is out)</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-03T04:10:26Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14972#p14972</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14971#p14971"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />I think the only reason to use a higher sample rate for the audio interface than Pianoteq would be to further reduce latency, if the buffer size was already at the lowest setting.&nbsp; &nbsp;The reason I asked about 48000/256 is because this would produce EXACTLY the same ASIO latency as 96000/512, and may also slightly improve performance, because Pianoteq would then be sending audio to the ASIO driver at half the rate.&nbsp; (i.e 48000 samples/s instead of 96000).</p><p>48000/256 seems to work fine for me, and I can even bump the polyphony up to 64 it seems. (I watched the CPU graph in Pianoteq, and it never produced the red CPU spikes, and I never heard any clicks)&nbsp; My netook has exactly the same CPU &amp; clock speed as yours. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>&nbsp; This is of course with Pianoteq&#039;s internal sample rate set to the same as you - 24000.&nbsp; Not too shabby, eh? <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i>&nbsp; I am using ASIO4ALL with the internal audio interface.</p><p>Unfortunately my audio interface doesn&#039;t support a sample rate of 24000 - I would have liked to have tried that too.</p><p>Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-03T02:42:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14971#p14971</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14969#p14969"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Luc Henrion wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>what&#039;s the point in the &quot;battery life&quot;? I suppose neither your keyboard neither your PA system is running on battery anyway... or is it ???</p></blockquote></div><p>Well, for me, I appreciate less wires and plugs, and my controller can be powered by USB also. This is for gigs mainly, but at home it&#039;s sometimes cool to have a keyboard setup, assuming headphones not an amp, that needs no AC. Especially during a thunderstorm <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-02T15:26:05Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14969#p14969</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14967#p14967"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>what&#039;s the point in the &quot;battery life&quot;? I suppose neither your keyboard neither your PA system is running on battery anyway... or is it ???</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-02T15:14:18Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14967#p14967</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14966#p14966"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>skip wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Michael,<br />Is there any reason you chose 96000/512 instead of 48000/256?&nbsp; </p><p>Thanks,<br />Greg.</p></blockquote></div><p>Hey Greg,</p><p>It was a while ago, so I&#039;m not entirely sure, but I think I was getting audio glitches with 256. If you like I can test it out.</p><p>Michael</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-02T14:45:49Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14966#p14966</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14965#p14965"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />Is there any reason you chose 96000/512 instead of 48000/256?&nbsp; </p><p>Thanks,<br />Greg.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[skip]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=353</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-02T13:45:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14965#p14965</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: (Ultra-)Portable configuration running Pianoteq]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14960#p14960"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I run Pianoteq without issues of any kind on an Asus eee netbook with the N450 processor and 2GB of memory. The settings are: internal sample rate of 24000Hz, host sample rate of 96000Hz (HD audio via the internal soundcard), 512 samples, polyphony set to 48, and this gives me a latency of 5.3ms. I set the CPU frequency to a constant 1600Mhz, no throttling.</p><p>Once it&#039;s set up, I close the lid and change settings/patches via my controller. The battery life is excellent, because the biggest drain on battery life is usually the display.</p><p>Michael</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Michael H]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1163</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2011-01-01T22:30:20Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14960#p14960</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
