<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - 105 keys, great!]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1674</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in 105 keys, great!.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:41:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934938#p934938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>That switch is great! Anyway, it would be more intuitive to me if the instruments had their original range by default. Since an ideally round + button is not misinterpreted as a design shape of the interface that easy it would also be easier to find the function.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Modellingoptimist)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 08:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934938#p934938</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934927#p934927</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>@kridlatec: found it, thanks. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kalessin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934927#p934927</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934926#p934926</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>kalessin wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>Where? Where? Wheeeere? <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p><i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i>)) In the left lower part of PT keyboard there is small sign of minus <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kridlatec)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934926#p934926</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934925#p934925</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>Where? Where? Wheeeere? <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kalessin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934925#p934925</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934922#p934922</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Kridlatec)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934922#p934922</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934884#p934884</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beemer wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>You said &quot;since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation&quot;.&nbsp; &nbsp;Please explain what you mean by this.</p><p>Ian</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>It means that I forgot to delete a part of a previous sentence <i class="far fa-grin-tongue-squint smiley"></i> ! &quot;non resonation&quot;&nbsp; isn&#039;t supposed to be there <i class="far fa-grin-tongue smiley"></i></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Xain)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934884#p934884</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934874#p934874</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think the question is: if the simulation models more strings than the original has, do these strings change the sound. I.e., does the virtual grand sound any different in the bass since it has a few bass strings more? My guess would be: yes, but only subtly so.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (kalessin)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934874#p934874</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934868#p934868</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Xain wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s quite an old post, but still, I bring it back to life for two reasons.</p><p>Firstly, I wanted to ask you if the following reasoning makes sense : even if we don&#039;t use the 105-keys extended notes, they still count when we use the pedal - which means richer resonances (but also, marginally, a loss of realism : the 105-keys D4 will NEVER sound as a real Steinway D, since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation. So, virtually, PTQ might be better than the real thing, at least under this aspect !).<br />Does this actually happen in PTQ ? Or the extra notes are somewhat activated only when we actually use them ?</p><p>The second reason is Jope&#039;s post, which in my opinion raises a good point : for the pianofortes and the hitsorical pianos, there should be at least a preset comprising 88 keys - as in the case of the Neupert harpsichord.<br />(maybe this is easily possible in the STD version, but I couldn&#039;t possibly know since I&#039;m still using using the Stage version)</p></blockquote></div><p>You said &quot;since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation&quot;.&nbsp; &nbsp;Please explain what you mean by this.</p><p>Ian</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Beemer)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934868#p934868</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934856#p934856</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s quite an old post, but still, I bring it back to life for two reasons.</p><p>Firstly, I wanted to ask you if the following reasoning makes sense : even if we don&#039;t use the 105-keys extended notes, they still count when we use the pedal - which means richer resonances (but also, marginally, a loss of realism : the 105-keys D4 will NEVER sound as a real Steinway D, since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation. So, virtually, PTQ might be better than the real thing, at least under this aspect !).<br />Does this actually happen in PTQ ? Or the extra notes are somewhat activated only when we actually use them ?</p><p>The second reason is Jope&#039;s post, which in my opinion raises a good point : for the pianofortes and the hitsorical pianos, there should be at least a preset comprising 88 keys - as in the case of the Neupert harpsichord.<br />(maybe this is easily possible in the STD version, but I couldn&#039;t possibly know since I&#039;m still using using the Stage version)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Xain)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 17:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934856#p934856</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14330#p14330</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I really like this, it could add some roughness and &quot;drama&quot; to some bass notes. I imediately went to work and invented a &quot;4 hand&quot; version of a piece i did for a video game:</p><p><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?file=dbd_pianotune.mp3">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...notune.mp3</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (CosmicD)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14330#p14330</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14305#p14305</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm... Why should one spend much money to get a keyboard in order to access notes that sound like a helicopter hitting an overhead power cable...<br />Well, thanks anyway, it doesn&#039;t hurt at all and I do not have to use the additional range (-:<br />BTW sometimes I wish some of the pianoforte models had an extended note range, but extended to the 88 key standard would be more than sufficient for these.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Jope)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14305#p14305</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14223#p14223</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice surprise, it&#039;s always a delight to read about new features via the forum. &quot;You heard it here first!&quot;</p><p>Now I&#039;m curious to hear about appropriate hardware solutions to effectively play with that extended range without resorting to sequencing and changing octaves via MIDI while playing.&nbsp; Is there a 2 octave weighted keyboard that could be used to cover the final octaves (and use the standard 88 key controller for the A-1 range on up)?</p><p>Nice demo, Joe.&nbsp; Of course, now you need to change your name to jfelice105keys <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Cheers to Modartt!<br />Chris</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (doobya)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14223#p14223</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14222#p14222</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Please note that we just found a bug (related to dampers and harp resonance) in the version 3.6.5 and have re-updated it. So if you have installed it before this message was sent, I suggest that you download it again, sorry for that !</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (julien)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14222#p14222</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14220#p14220</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>the thing is that I&#039;m only able to practice about 2-3 hours a day. If I could double that, no doubt I would be able to equal the demos... ;-)</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Luc Henrion)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14220#p14220</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14219#p14219</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree. But what kind of gear would you need to make your own keyboard sound like that.Almost all the Pianotec demos sound fantastic, but I must admit that the sound I get from my trial version is VERY far from that. Anyway, you can enjoy what others are doing.<br />cat</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (cat)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14219#p14219</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
