<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - 105 keys, great!]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1674&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2014-10-09T08:41:03Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1674</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934938#p934938"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>That switch is great! Anyway, it would be more intuitive to me if the instruments had their original range by default. Since an ideally round + button is not misinterpreted as a design shape of the interface that easy it would also be easier to find the function.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Modellingoptimist]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3812</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-09T08:41:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934938#p934938</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934927#p934927"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>@kridlatec: found it, thanks. <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kalessin]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3808</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-08T18:17:51Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934927#p934927</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934926#p934926"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>kalessin wrote:</cite><blockquote><div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>Where? Where? Wheeeere? <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p><i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i>)) In the left lower part of PT keyboard there is small sign of minus <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kridlatec]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3193</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-08T18:13:56Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934926#p934926</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934925#p934925"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Kridlatec wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p></blockquote></div><p>Where? Where? Wheeeere? <i class="far fa-laugh smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kalessin]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3808</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-08T18:04:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934925#p934925</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934922#p934922"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It was not easy to find the &quot;Extended keyboard range switch&quot; in new 5.1 version, but finally, I noticed it <i class="far fa-smile-beam smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Kridlatec]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3193</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-08T17:52:48Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934922#p934922</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934884#p934884"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Beemer wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>You said &quot;since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation&quot;.&nbsp; &nbsp;Please explain what you mean by this.</p><p>Ian</p></blockquote></div><br /><p>It means that I forgot to delete a part of a previous sentence <i class="far fa-grin-tongue-squint smiley"></i> ! &quot;non resonation&quot;&nbsp; isn&#039;t supposed to be there <i class="far fa-grin-tongue smiley"></i></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Xain]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3948</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-06T19:10:47Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934884#p934884</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934874#p934874"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I think the question is: if the simulation models more strings than the original has, do these strings change the sound. I.e., does the virtual grand sound any different in the bass since it has a few bass strings more? My guess would be: yes, but only subtly so.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[kalessin]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3808</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-06T14:48:21Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934874#p934874</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934868#p934868"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Xain wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s quite an old post, but still, I bring it back to life for two reasons.</p><p>Firstly, I wanted to ask you if the following reasoning makes sense : even if we don&#039;t use the 105-keys extended notes, they still count when we use the pedal - which means richer resonances (but also, marginally, a loss of realism : the 105-keys D4 will NEVER sound as a real Steinway D, since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation. So, virtually, PTQ might be better than the real thing, at least under this aspect !).<br />Does this actually happen in PTQ ? Or the extra notes are somewhat activated only when we actually use them ?</p><p>The second reason is Jope&#039;s post, which in my opinion raises a good point : for the pianofortes and the hitsorical pianos, there should be at least a preset comprising 88 keys - as in the case of the Neupert harpsichord.<br />(maybe this is easily possible in the STD version, but I couldn&#039;t possibly know since I&#039;m still using using the Stage version)</p></blockquote></div><p>You said &quot;since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation&quot;.&nbsp; &nbsp;Please explain what you mean by this.</p><p>Ian</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Beemer]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3726</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-06T09:36:46Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934868#p934868</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934856#p934856"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s quite an old post, but still, I bring it back to life for two reasons.</p><p>Firstly, I wanted to ask you if the following reasoning makes sense : even if we don&#039;t use the 105-keys extended notes, they still count when we use the pedal - which means richer resonances (but also, marginally, a loss of realism : the 105-keys D4 will NEVER sound as a real Steinway D, since the real thing has a whole octave less non resonation. So, virtually, PTQ might be better than the real thing, at least under this aspect !).<br />Does this actually happen in PTQ ? Or the extra notes are somewhat activated only when we actually use them ?</p><p>The second reason is Jope&#039;s post, which in my opinion raises a good point : for the pianofortes and the hitsorical pianos, there should be at least a preset comprising 88 keys - as in the case of the Neupert harpsichord.<br />(maybe this is easily possible in the STD version, but I couldn&#039;t possibly know since I&#039;m still using using the Stage version)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Xain]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=3948</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2014-10-05T17:23:32Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=934856#p934856</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14330#p14330"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I really like this, it could add some roughness and &quot;drama&quot; to some bass notes. I imediately went to work and invented a &quot;4 hand&quot; version of a piece i did for a video game:</p><p><a href="http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.php?file=dbd_pianotune.mp3">http://www.forum-pianoteq.com/uploads.p...notune.mp3</a></p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[CosmicD]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=31</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-28T22:07:40Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14330#p14330</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14305#p14305"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm... Why should one spend much money to get a keyboard in order to access notes that sound like a helicopter hitting an overhead power cable...<br />Well, thanks anyway, it doesn&#039;t hurt at all and I do not have to use the additional range (-:<br />BTW sometimes I wish some of the pianoforte models had an extended note range, but extended to the 88 key standard would be more than sufficient for these.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Jope]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=633</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-27T12:27:10Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14305#p14305</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14223#p14223"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Nice surprise, it&#039;s always a delight to read about new features via the forum. &quot;You heard it here first!&quot;</p><p>Now I&#039;m curious to hear about appropriate hardware solutions to effectively play with that extended range without resorting to sequencing and changing octaves via MIDI while playing.&nbsp; Is there a 2 octave weighted keyboard that could be used to cover the final octaves (and use the standard 88 key controller for the A-1 range on up)?</p><p>Nice demo, Joe.&nbsp; Of course, now you need to change your name to jfelice105keys <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><p>Cheers to Modartt!<br />Chris</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[doobya]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=952</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-20T14:42:16Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14223#p14223</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14222#p14222"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Please note that we just found a bug (related to dampers and harp resonance) in the version 3.6.5 and have re-updated it. So if you have installed it before this message was sent, I suggest that you download it again, sorry for that !</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[julien]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=2</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-20T14:16:15Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14222#p14222</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14220#p14220"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>the thing is that I&#039;m only able to practice about 2-3 hours a day. If I could double that, no doubt I would be able to equal the demos... ;-)</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Luc Henrion]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=6</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-20T13:35:03Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14220#p14220</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: 105 keys, great!]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14219#p14219"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I agree. But what kind of gear would you need to make your own keyboard sound like that.Almost all the Pianotec demos sound fantastic, but I must admit that the sound I get from my trial version is VERY far from that. Anyway, you can enjoy what others are doing.<br />cat</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[cat]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1619</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-10-20T12:39:33Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=14219#p14219</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
