<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title type="html"><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Pitch bend & sympathetic resonance]]></title>
	<link rel="self" href="https://forum.modartt.com/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1573&amp;type=atom"/>
	<updated>2010-07-21T16:43:13Z</updated>
	<generator>PunBB</generator>
	<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1573</id>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Re: Pitch bend & sympathetic resonance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13207#p13207"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi Orbik,<br />you are right, pitch bend of sympathetic resonances was possible in version 2 but not in version 3. It is not a bug, it is due to the fact that we implemented in version 3 a more sophisticated sympathetic resonances algorithm which is not compatible with pitch bend.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[Philippe Guillaume]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=5</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-21T16:43:13Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13207#p13207</id>
		</entry>
		<entry>
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Pitch bend & sympathetic resonance]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" href="https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13200#p13200"/>
			<content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p><p>I played around with the trial version 3.6.1, and must say I&#039;m rather impressed by the overall sound and playability.</p><p>I also liked the &quot;unorthodox&quot; ability of pitch bending (varying string tensions). But the sympathetically excited overtones remain fixed while bending, which seems wrong. I&#039;ve tried the v2 earlier and iirc, the overtones changed with pitch bend as expected.</p><p>Is this a bug or intentional behavior? I mean it may make sense while using sustain or harmonic pedal to allow bending 1 note without affecting the &quot;background&quot; resonances. But if it&#039;s just a single or a few undamped notes resonating, I&#039;d definitely prefer the physically accurate behavior.</p>]]></content>
			<author>
				<name><![CDATA[orbik]]></name>
				<uri>https://forum.modartt.com/profile.php?id=1495</uri>
			</author>
			<updated>2010-07-21T10:00:45Z</updated>
			<id>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=13200#p13200</id>
		</entry>
</feed>
