<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Modartt user forum - Netbook success]]></title>
		<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?id=1445</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Netbook success.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:01:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Netbook success]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12248#p12248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul, </p><p>I&#039;m not that knowledgeable, and perhaps someone else can chime in, but my understanding is that the performance index measures how well a computer system is able to handle the demands of Pianoteq, which is processor intensive. </p><p>The higher the performance index, the better. For instance, my Core 2 Duo machine gets a performance index of 38-40. I can run it at a higher bitrate and at lower latency than with a netbook, where compromises need to be made.</p><p>That Pianoteq can run AT ALL on a netbook, and be stable, I find amazing.</p><p>Michael</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12248#p12248</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Netbook success]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12230#p12230</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>Michael H wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>....I get a solid performance index of 9, and sometimes 10</p></blockquote></div><p>Could somebody please explain exactly what this value represents?</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Paul)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 08:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12230#p12230</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Netbook success]]></title>
			<link>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12218#p12218</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I recently picked up an Asus 1005HA netbook, and I&#039;m happy to report that it runs Pianoteq well, given the limitations of the current Atom processors. This netbook has the N270 processor which runs at 1.6Ghz. <br />I get a solid performance index of 9, and sometimes 10, with VERY occasional glitches at 96Khz and 256 samples, with an internal sample rate of 24Khz and a latency of 2.7 ms. It&#039;s set to 48 voices and I expect more wouldn&#039;t be a problem, but I don&#039;t need them. The processor hit hasn&#039;t gotten past 57%.</p><p>The only performance issue I&#039;ve seen is that moving a volume/cc7 slider while playing notes produces crackling and distortion. Bumping things up to 512 samples and 5.3 ms latency cures that. Some may find that much latency objectionable, I&#039;m undecided.</p><p>If anyone can refer me to some Windows 7 performance tweaks I&#039;d be grateful. Black Viper has a site for windows services tweaks that I&#039;m checking out too.</p><p>Now that I&#039;ve got one of these netbooks I can see the appeal- it&#039;s a lot of fun, and amazingly it runs Pianoteq! In fact, I&#039;ve got it running Cantabile, Pianoteq and NI B4 at once, and so far so good <i class="far fa-smile smiley"></i></p><br /><p>Michael</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[null@example.com (Michael H)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://forum.modartt.com/viewtopic.php?pid=12218#p12218</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
